Literature DB >> 32500442

Severe persistent coronal imbalance following instrumented posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Jason B Anari1, Scott M LaValva1,2, John M Flynn3, Aaron M Tatad1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) impact of severe (> 4 cm) post-operative coronal imbalance at 2 years following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Coronal imbalance is an unfavorable outcome following PSF for AIS, though the degree of imbalance in such patients is typically mild. We hypothesize that a small number of patients become and remain severely imbalanced post-operatively, though this phenomenon has not been well studied.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from a large multicenter registry were reviewed. Patients with severe coronal imbalance (SCIB; > 4 cm) 2 years after PSF were included. Matched controls without SCIB at 2 years were included at a 3:1 ratio. Comparisons were made between demographics, pre-operative radiographic measures, surgical factors, residual post-operative radiographic measures, and 2-year SRS-22 scores.
RESULTS: Nine of 954 (0.9%) patients (88.9% females; mean age 14.8 ± 2.3 years) were found to be severely imbalanced at 2 years. These patients had significantly greater pre-operative bending thoracic curve magnitude (45° vs. 33°; p = 0.013), curve flexibility (22.9% vs. 63.3%; p = 0.004), and kyphosis (41° vs. 26.5°; p = 0.034) compared to matched controls. Pre-operative curve flexibility of < 20% was associated with a 23.8 times greater odds of SCIB (95% CI 2.1-250; p = 0.008). With respect to HRQoL, median SRS-22 pain (4.1 vs. 4.8; p = 0.041), self-image (3.9 vs. 4.6; p = 0.013), general function (4.5 vs. 5; p = 0.022), and total (4.1 vs. 4.7; p = 0.012) scores at 2 years were significantly lower in cases compared to controls.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, thoracic curve stiffness was a strong risk factor for severe post-operative coronal imbalance, which was associated with poor HRQoL measures. Increased pre-operative thoracic curve stiffness (< 20% flexibility) should raise surgeon awareness for altering surgical approach to minimize the risk of severe post-operative coronal imbalance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idopathic scoliosis; Coronal balance; Severe imbalance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32500442     DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00153-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  23 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents.

Authors:  M Timothy Hresko
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold.

Authors:  Peter J Neumann; Joshua T Cohen; Milton C Weinstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Optimal surgical care for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an international consensus.

Authors:  Marinus de Kleuver; Stephen J Lewis; Niccole M Germscheid; Steven J Kamper; Ahmet Alanay; Sigurd H Berven; Kenneth M Cheung; Manabu Ito; Lawrence G Lenke; David W Polly; Yong Qiu; Maurits van Tulder; Christopher Shaffrey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Anterior controllable antidisplacement and fusion surgery for the treatment of multilevel severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy: preliminary clinical results of a novel technique.

Authors:  Jingchuan Sun; Jiangang Shi; Ximing Xu; Yong Yang; Yuan Wang; Qingjie Kong; Haisong Yang; Yongfei Guo; Dan Han; Jingjing Jiang; Guodong Shi; Wen Yuan; Lianshun Jia
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Selective thoracic fusion of a left decompensated main thoracic curve: proceed with caution?

Authors:  T Barrett Sullivan; Tracey P Bastrom; Carrie E Bartley; Suken A Shah; Baron S Lonner; Jahangir Asghar; Firoz Miyanji; Peter O Newton; Burt Yaszay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Markus Rafael Konieczny; Hüsseyin Senyurt; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Does Staphylococcus aureus nasal decontamination affect the rate of early surgical site infection in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?

Authors:  Cindy Mallet; Marion Caseris; Catherine Doit; Anne-Laure Simon; Daphné Michelet; Chrystel Madre; Keyvan Mazda; Stéphane Bonacorsi; Brice Ilharreborde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Tsz Ping Lam; Man Sang Wong; Bobby Kin Wah Ng; Kwong Man Lee; King Lok Liu; Lik Hang Hung; Ajax Hong Yin Lau; Sai Wing Sin; Wing Kwan Kwok; Fiona Wai Ping Yu; Yong Qiu; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects.

Authors:  Marc A Asher; Douglas C Burton
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2006-03-31

10.  Metamorphosis of human lumbar vertebrae induced by VEPTR growth modulation and stress shielding.

Authors:  Carol C Hasler; Daniel Studer; Philippe Büchler
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.548

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sagittal spinopelvic changes after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Denver A Burton; Alexa J Karkenny; Jacob F Schulz; Regina Hanstein; Jaime A Gomez
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.