Literature DB >> 25359620

Molecular phenotype is associated with survival in breast cancer patients with spinal bone metastases.

L Bollen1, C Wibmer, M Wang, Y M van der Linden, A Leithner, C E Bünger, A B Jensen, M Fiocco, G Bratschitsch, W Pondaag, J V M G Bovée, P D S Dijkstra.   

Abstract

To aid in therapy selection for patients with spinal bone metastases (SBM), predictive models have been developed. These models consider SBM from breast cancer a positive predictive factor, but do not take phenotypes based on estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptors into account. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether receptors are associated with survival, when the disease has progressed up to SBM. All patients who were treated for SBM from breast cancer between 2005 and 2012 were included in this international multi-center retrospective study (n = 111). Reports were reviewed for ER, PR and HER2 status and subsequently subdivided into one of four categories; luminal A, luminal B, HER2 and triple negative. Survival time was calculated as the difference between start of treatment for SBM and date of death. Analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Median follow-up was 3.7 years. Survival times in the luminal B and HER2 categories were not significantly different to the luminal A category and were joined into a single receptor positive category. Eighty-five patients (77 %) had a receptor positive phenotype and 25 (23 %) had a triple negative phenotype. Median survival time was 22.5 months (95 %CI 18.0-26.9) for the receptor positive category and 6.7 months (95 %CI 2.4-10.9) for the triple negative category (p < 0.001). Patients with SBM from breast cancer with a triple negative phenotype have a shorter survival time than patients with a receptor positive phenotype. Models estimating survival should be adjusted accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25359620     DOI: 10.1007/s10585-014-9685-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis        ISSN: 0262-0898            Impact factor:   5.150


  19 in total

Review 1.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time.

Authors:  M Schemper; T L Smith
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-08

3.  Prediction of survival in patients with metastases in the spinal column: results based on a randomized trial of radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yvette M van der Linden; Sander P D S Dijkstra; Ernest J A Vonk; Corrie A M Marijnen; Jan Willem H Leer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Cheng Fan; Daniel S Oh; Lodewyk Wessels; Britta Weigelt; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Andrew B Nobel; Laura J van't Veer; Charles M Perou
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Predictive value of Tokuhashi scoring systems in spinal metastases, focusing on various primary tumor groups: evaluation of 448 patients in the Aarhus spinal metastases database.

Authors:  Miao Wang; Cody Eric Bünger; Haisheng Li; Chunsen Wu; Kristian Høy; Bent Niedermann; Peter Helmig; Yu Wang; Anders Bonde Jensen; Katrin Schättiger; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Risk factors for survival of 106 surgically treated patients with symptomatic spinal epidural metastases.

Authors:  L Bollen; G C W de Ruiter; W Pondaag; M P Arts; M Fiocco; T J T Hazen; W C Peul; P D S Dijkstra
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Positive and negative prognostic variables for patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic breast disease.

Authors:  Daniel M Sciubba; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ian Suk; Dima Suki; Marcos V C Maldaun; Ian E McCutcheon; Remi Nader; Richard Theriault; Laurence D Rhines; Joseph A Shehadi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Prognostic factors associated with survival in patients with symptomatic spinal bone metastases: a retrospective cohort study of 1,043 patients.

Authors:  Laurens Bollen; Yvette M van der Linden; Willem Pondaag; Marta Fiocco; Bas P M Pattynama; Corrie A M Marijnen; Rob G H H Nelissen; Wilco C Peul; P D Sander Dijkstra
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases. Prognostication in 241 patients.

Authors:  H C Bauer; R Wedin
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-04
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Metastatic breast cancer in the spine : Molecular predictors for choosing adequate treatment strategies].

Authors:  D Adler; M Kriegsmann; P Sinn; A Schneeweiss; H Almansour; B Lehner; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Prognostic factors for survival of women with unstable spinal bone metastases from breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert Foerster; Thomas Bruckner; Tilman Bostel; Ingmar Schlampp; Juergen Debus; Harald Rief
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 3.  Prognostic Factors for Bone Survival and Functional Outcomes in Patients With Breast Cancer Spine Metastases.

Authors:  Rui-Qi Qiao; Hao-Ran Zhang; Rong-Xing Ma; Rui-Feng Li; Yong-Cheng Hu
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec

Review 4.  Incidence, risk factors and prognostic characteristics of bone metastases and skeletal-related events (SREs) in breast cancer patients: A systematic review of the real world data.

Authors:  Hongwei Zhang; Wei Zhu; Ewelina Biskup; Weige Yang; Ziang Yang; Hong Wang; Xiaochun Qiu; Chengjiao Zhang; Guangxia Hu; Guangfu Hu
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.072

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.