Literature DB >> 17484425

The role of processing difficulty in the predictive utility of working memory span.

Michael Bunting1.   

Abstract

Storage-plus-processing working memory span tasks (e.g., operation span [OSPAN]) are strong predictors of higher order cognition, including general fluid intelligence. This is due, in part, to the difficulty of the processing component. When the processing component prevents only articulatory rehearsal, but not executive attentional control, the predictive utility is attenuated. Participants in one experiment (N = 59) completed Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM) and multiple versions of OSPAN and probed recall (PR). A distractor task (high or low difficulty) was added to PR, and OSPAN's processing component was manipulated for difficulty. OSPAN and PR correlated with RAPM when the processing component took executive attentional control. These results are suggestive of resource sharing between processing and storage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17484425     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  On the interpretation of working memory span in adults.

Authors:  J N Towse; G J Hitch; U Hutton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Sophie Bernardin; Valerie Camos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-03

Review 4.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  What makes working memory spans so predictive of high-level cognition?

Authors:  Raphaëlle Lépine; Pierre Barrouillet; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

6.  Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory.

Authors:  Michael Bunting
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension.

Authors:  G S Waters; D Caplan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1996-02

8.  Individual differences in working memory capacity: more evidence for a general capacity theory.

Authors:  A R Conway; R W Engle
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1996-11

9.  The capacity for generating information by randomization.

Authors:  A D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.143

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Why is working memory capacity related to matrix reasoning tasks?

Authors:  Tyler L Harrison; Zach Shipstead; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-04

2.  A new modified listening span task to enhance validity of working memory assessment for people with and without aphasia.

Authors:  Maria V Ivanova; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span.

Authors:  Gregory C Burgess; Jeremy R Gray; Andrew R A Conway; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-11

4.  Controlling the stream of thought: working memory capacity predicts adjustment of mind-wandering to situational demands.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; C Dennis Boywitt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.