Literature DB >> 24448763

Controlling the stream of thought: working memory capacity predicts adjustment of mind-wandering to situational demands.

Jan Rummel1, C Dennis Boywitt.   

Abstract

Although engaging in task-unrelated thoughts can be enjoyable and functional under certain circumstances, allowing one's mind to wander off-task will come at a cost to performance in many situations. Given that task-unrelated thoughts need to be blocked out when the current task requires full attention, it has been argued that cognitive control is necessary to prevent mind-wandering from becoming maladaptive. Extending this idea, we exposed participants to tasks of different demands and assessed mind-wandering via thought probes. Employing a latent-change model, we found mind-wandering to be adjusted to current task demands. As hypothesized, the degree of adjustment was predicted by working memory capacity, indicating that participants with higher working memory capacity were more flexible in their coordination of on- and off-task thoughts. Notably, the better the adjustment, the smaller performance decrements due to increased task demands were. On the basis of these findings, we argue that cognitive control does not simply allow blocking out task-unrelated thoughts but, rather, allows one to flexibly adjust mind-wandering to situational demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24448763     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0580-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  16 in total

1.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-03

2.  Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  An automated version of the operation span task.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Richard P Heitz; Josef C Schrock; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

4.  The role of processing difficulty in the predictive utility of working memory span.

Authors:  Michael Bunting
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

Review 5.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

Review 6.  Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data.

Authors:  John J McArdle
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008).

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

9.  Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task.

Authors:  Jennifer C McVay; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts.

Authors:  Shi Feng; Sidney D'Mello; Arthur C Graesser
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06
View more
  19 in total

1.  For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Georgina M Gross; Charlotte A Chun; Bridget A Smeekens; Matt E Meier; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-07-18

2.  The RNA-binding protein, ZC3H14, is required for proper poly(A) tail length control, expression of synaptic proteins, and brain function in mice.

Authors:  Jennifer Rha; Stephanie K Jones; Jonathan Fidler; Ayan Banerjee; Sara W Leung; Kevin J Morris; Jennifer C Wong; George Andrew S Inglis; Lindsey Shapiro; Qiudong Deng; Alicia A Cutler; Adam M Hanif; Machelle T Pardue; Ashleigh Schaffer; Nicholas T Seyfried; Kenneth H Moberg; Gary J Bassell; Andrew Escayg; Paul S García; Anita H Corbett
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  The awakening of the attention: Evidence for a link between the monitoring of mind wandering and prospective goals.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Daniel Smilek; Brandon C W Ralph; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-01-22

4.  The impact of social isolation and changes in work patterns on ongoing thought during the first COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Brontë Mckeown; Giulia L Poerio; Will H Strawson; Léa M Martinon; Leigh M Riby; Elizabeth Jefferies; Cade McCall; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Individual differences in the executive control of attention, memory, and thought, and their associations with schizotypy.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Matt E Meier; Bridget A Smeekens; Georgina M Gross; Charlotte A Chun; Paul J Silvia; Thomas R Kwapil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-06-16

Review 6.  Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention.

Authors:  Paul Seli; Evan F Risko; Daniel Smilek; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

Review 8.  The neural correlates of ongoing conscious thought.

Authors:  Jonathan Smallwood; Adam Turnbull; Hao-Ting Wang; Nerissa S P Ho; Giulia L Poerio; Theodoros Karapanagiotidis; Delali Konu; Brontë Mckeown; Meichao Zhang; Charlotte Murphy; Deniz Vatansever; Danilo Bzdok; Mahiko Konishi; Robert Leech; Paul Seli; Jonathan W Schooler; Boris Bernhardt; Daniel S Margulies; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-02-01

9.  A correspondence between individual differences in the brain's intrinsic functional architecture and the content and form of self-generated thoughts.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Gorgolewski; Dan Lurie; Sebastian Urchs; Judy A Kipping; R Cameron Craddock; Michael P Milham; Daniel S Margulies; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Attentional disengagements in educational contexts: a diary investigation of everyday mind-wandering and distraction.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Brittany D McMillan
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.