Literature DB >> 8934455

Individual differences in working memory capacity: more evidence for a general capacity theory.

A R Conway1, R W Engle.   

Abstract

The causes of the positive relationship between comprehension and measures of working memory capacity remain unclear. This study tests three hypotheses for the relationship by equating the difficulty, for 48 individual subjects, of processing demands in complex working memory tasks. Even with difficulty of processing equated, the relationship between number of words recalled in the working memory measure and comprehension remained high and significant. The results favour a general capacity view. We suggest that high working memory span subjects have more limited-capacity attentional resources available to them than low span subjects and that individual differences in working memory capacity will have implications for any task that requires controlled effortful processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934455     DOI: 10.1080/741940997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  44 in total

1.  On the interpretation of working memory span in adults.

Authors:  J N Towse; G J Hitch; U Hutton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

Review 2.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind.

Authors:  Lisa Feldman Barrett; Michele M Tugade; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Classifying retrieval strategies as a function of working memory.

Authors:  Jenni L Schelble; David J Therriault; M David Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

5.  Is the relationship of prosaccade reaction times and antisaccade errors mediated by working memory?

Authors:  Trevor J Crawford; Elisabeth Parker; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Jenny Mayes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Interrelationships between pain processing, cortisol and cognitive performance in chronic whiplash-associated disorders.

Authors:  Mira Meeus; Jessica Van Oosterwijck; Kelly Ickmans; Isabel Baert; Iris Coppieters; Nathalie Roussel; Filip Struyf; Nathalie Pattyn; Jo Nijs
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  The role of processing difficulty in the predictive utility of working memory span.

Authors:  Michael Bunting
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

8.  Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task.

Authors:  Doris Keye; Oliver Wilhelm; Klaus Oberauer; Don van Ravenzwaaij
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

Review 9.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

Review 10.  CNTRICS final task selection: working memory.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Marc G Berman; Randy Engle; Jessica Hurdelbrink Jones; John Jonides; Angus Macdonald; Derek Evan Nee; Thomas S Redick; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.