Literature DB >> 24986153

A new modified listening span task to enhance validity of working memory assessment for people with and without aphasia.

Maria V Ivanova1, Brooke Hallowell2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Deficits in working memory (WM) are an important subset of cognitive processing deficits associated with aphasia. However, there are serious limitations to research on WM in aphasia largely due to the lack of an established valid measure of WM impairment for this population. The aim of the current study was to address shortcomings of previous measures by developing and empirically evaluating a novel WM task with a sentence-picture matching processing component designed to circumvent confounds inherent in existing measures of WM in aphasia. The novel WM task was presented to persons with (n=27) and without (n=33) aphasia. Results demonstrated high concurrent validity of a novel WM task. Individuals with aphasia performed significantly worse on all conditions of the WM task compared to individuals without aphasia. Different patterns of performance across conditions were observed for the two groups. Additionally, WM capacity was significantly related to auditory comprehension abilities in individuals with mild aphasia but not those with moderate aphasia. Strengths of the novel WM task are that it allows for differential control for length versus complexity of verbal stimuli and indexing of the relative influence of each, minimizes metalinguistic requirements, enables control for complexity of processing components, allows participants to respond with simple gestures or verbally, and eliminates reading requirements. Results support the feasibility and validity of using a novel task to assess WM in individuals with and without aphasia. LEARNING OUTCOMES: Readers will be able to (1) discuss the limitations of current working memory measures for individuals with aphasia; (2) describe how task design features of a new working memory task for people with aphasia address shortcomings of existing measures; (3) summarize the evidence supporting the validity of the novel working memory task.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphasia; Cognitive processing; Complex span tasks; Working memory; Working memory assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986153      PMCID: PMC4250515          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  43 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Working memory: a foundation for executive abilities and higher-order cognitive skills.

Authors:  L T Connor; A J MacKay; D A White
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.761

3.  Time and cognitive load in working memory.

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Sophie Bernardin; Sophie Portrat; Evie Vergauwe; Valérie Camos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide.

Authors:  Andrew R A Conway; Michael J Kane; Michael F Bunting; D Zach Hambrick; Oliver Wilhelm; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

5.  Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Randall W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasic patients in sentence-picture matching tasks.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters; N Hildebrandt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

8.  New visual acuity test for pre-school children.

Authors:  L Hyvärinen; R Näsänen; P Laurinen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1980-08

9.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Working Memory and its Relationship to Aphasia.

Authors:  Heather Harris Wright; Gerasimos Fergadiotis
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: the role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Meeting Point: Where Language Production and Working Memory Share Resources.

Authors:  Byurakn Ishkhanyan; Kasper Boye; Jesper Mogensen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-02

Review 2.  The use of standardised short-term and working memory tests in aphasia research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Murray; Christos Salis; Nadine Martin; Jenny Dralle
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  More Than the Verbal Stimulus Matters: Visual Attention in Language Assessment for People With Aphasia Using Multiple-Choice Image Displays.

Authors:  Sabine Heuer; Maria V Ivanova; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The paced auditory serial addition test for working memory assessment: Psychometric properties.

Authors:  Maryam Nikravesh; Zahra Jafari; Masoud Mehrpour; Roozbeh Kazemi; Younes Amiri Shavaki; Shamim Hossienifar; Mohamad Parsa Azizi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2017-09-11

5.  Executive functions assessment in patients with language impairment A systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Paula Bresolin Gonçalves; Clarissa Mello; Andressa Hermes Pereira; Perrine Ferré; Rochele Paz Fonseca; Yves Joanette
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.