Literature DB >> 9666997

Adjustment of fixation duration in visual search.

I T Hooge1, C J Erkelens.   

Abstract

To investigate whether fixation durations are adjusted to the duration of a foveal analysis task, we designed a search task in which each stimulus element yielded information about the position of the target. We asked subjects to look for the target by making eye movements in the direction indicated by each stimulus element. We explicitly asked the subjects to make the eye movements in the correct direction, but they did not always do this. They made only 65-80% of the eye movements in directions indicated by the stimulus elements. From these results we conclude that fixation durations are not solely determined by the immediate visual stimulus and that subjects encounter difficulties when trying to increase fixation durations to values that would enable them to direct saccades accurately. In a second experiment we shortened the presentation time in order to provide an incentive for the subjects to speed up search. Shortening the presentation time did not affect fixation duration. Therefore, we suggest that fixation duration is controlled by a mechanism that uses estimations of the foveal analysis time of previous fixated stimulus elements.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9666997     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00287-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  29 in total

1.  The timing of sequences of saccades in visual search.

Authors:  E M Van Loon; I Th C Hooge; A V Van den Berg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Longer fixation duration while viewing face images.

Authors:  Kun Guo; Sasan Mahmoodi; Robert G Robertson; Malcolm P Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Marking rejected distractors: a gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

4.  Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Tyler W Garaas; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Timing of saccadic eye movements during visual search for multiple targets.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Eye movements during scene viewing: evidence for mixed control of fixation durations.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Pierce L Graham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

8.  What determines saccade timing in sequences of coordinated eye and hand movements?

Authors:  Roger W Remington; Shu-Chieh Wu; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

Review 9.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect.

Authors:  Anina N Rich; Melina A Kunar; Michael J Van Wert; Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.