Literature DB >> 21571651

Advancements in MR imaging of the prostate: from diagnosis to interventions.

David Bonekamp1, Michael A Jacobs, Riham El-Khouli, Dan Stoianovici, Katarzyna J Macura.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in males and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men. Assessment of prostate cancer can be divided into detection, localization, and staging; accurate assessment is a prerequisite for optimal clinical management and therapy selection. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has been shown to be of particular help in localization and staging of prostate cancer. Traditional prostate MR imaging has been based on morphologic imaging with standard T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences, which has limited accuracy. Recent advances include additional functional and physiologic MR imaging techniques (diffusion-weighted imaging, MR spectroscopy, and perfusion imaging), which allow extension of the obtainable information beyond anatomic assessment. Multiparametric MR imaging provides the highest accuracy in diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. In addition, improvements in MR imaging hardware and software (3-T vs 1.5-T imaging) continue to improve spatial and temporal resolution and the signal-to-noise ratio of MR imaging examinations. Another recent advancement in the field is MR imaging guidance for targeted prostate biopsy, which is an alternative to the current standard of transrectal ultrasonography-guided systematic biopsy.
Copyright © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21571651      PMCID: PMC3093638          DOI: 10.1148/rg.313105139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  71 in total

1.  Organ-confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; Fergus V Coakley; Ying Lu; Jeffrey D Olpin; Louis Wu; Benjamin M Yeh; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  MR imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: comparison of an external phased-array coil to imaging with an endorectal coil at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Ivan Pedrosa; William C Dewolf; Houman Mahallati; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Image-fusion, augmented reality, and predictive surgical navigation.

Authors:  Osamu Ukimura; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Prostate rebiopsy is a poor surrogate of treatment efficacy in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Svetec; K McCabe; S Peretsman; E Klein; H Levin; S Optenberg; I Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2.

Authors:  Chan Kyo Kim; Byung Kwan Park; Bohyun Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores?

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Harriete Sanderson; Alan W Partin; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system.

Authors:  Juyoung A Jung; Fergus V Coakley; Daniel B Vigneron; Mark G Swanson; Aliya Qayyum; Vivian Weinberg; Kirk D Jones; Peter R Carroll; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  The incidence of hyperechoic prostate cancer in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Borislav Spajic; Hrvoje Eupic; Davor Tomas; Goran Stimac; Bozo Kruslin; Ognjen Kraus
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Parasagittal biopsies add minimal information in repeat saturation prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; J Stephen Jones; John Rabets; Gerard DeOreo; Craig D Zippe
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  [Multiparametric MRI, elastography, contrastenhanced TRUS. Are there indications with reliable diagnostic advantages before prostate biopsy?].

Authors:  A Hegele; L Skrobek; R Hofmann; P Olbert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Image guidance in the focal treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anthony N Hoang; Dmitry Volkin; Nitin K Yerram; Srinivas Vourganti; Jeffrey Nix; W Marston Linehan; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Ultrasound- and MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chiara Zini; Elisabeth Hipp; Stephen Thomas; Alessandro Napoli; Carlo Catalano; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-28

4.  [Magnetic resonance tomography-guided interventional procedure for diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schernthaner; T H Helbich; B J Fueger; M Margreiter; M Memarsadeghi; A Stiglbauer; H-G Linhart; A Doan; K Pinker; P Brader
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  B-mode and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging of prostate zonal anatomy: comparison with 3T T2-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Zachary A Miller; Tyler J Glass; Kirema Garcia-Reyes; Rajan T Gupta; Stephen J Rosenzweig; Christopher Kauffman; Thomas J Polascik; Andrew Buck; Evan Kulbacki; John Madden; Samantha L Lipman; Ned C Rouze; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 6.  Recent advances in imaging-guided interventions for prostate cancers.

Authors:  Xia Wu; Feng Zhang; Ran Chen; Weiliang Zheng; Xiaoming Yang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 7.  [Machine learning and multiparametric MRI for early diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  D Bonekamp; H-P Schlemmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions using magnetization transfer imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Samantha L Heller; Linda Moy; Sherlin Lavianlivi; Melanie Moccaldi; Sungheon Kim
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Relationship between T2 relaxation and apparent diffusion coefficient in malignant and non-malignant prostate regions and the effect of peripheral zone fractional volume.

Authors:  C J Simpkin; V A Morgan; S L Giles; S F Riches; C Parker; N M deSouza
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography in imaging evaluation of staging, restaging, treatment response, and prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.