Literature DB >> 15329895

Prostate-specific antigen: a review of the validation of the most commonly used cancer biomarker.

Javier Hernández1, Ian M Thompson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has had a tremendous impact on all aspects of the management of prostate carcinoma. Although PSA-based screening has resulted in a stage migration to more organ-confined tumors at the time of diagnosis, and has been temporally associated with a decrease in prostate carcinoma mortality, PSA screening is imperfect. A recent analysis of results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) has provided insight into the positive predictive value of PSA in the so-called "normal" range.
METHODS: The history of the discovery, initial studies, and subsequent widespread application of PSA screening is reviewed.
RESULTS: The application of PSA for screening preceded the development of current prostate biopsy techniques and an upper limit of normal was established without complete disease ascertainment. More recent modifications of PSA-based screening have been adopted clinically without sufficient validation. With current methods, overdiagnosis of clinically unimportant disease almost certainly occurs and high-grade, aggressive disease may not be detected sufficiently early to allow successful treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, the optimal upper limit of normal for PSA for prostate carcinoma screening is unknown. New biomarkers of disease are needed; these must be linked with disease prognosis and must be validated in rigorously designed clinical trials. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15329895     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  64 in total

Review 1.  Prostate cancer detection strategies.

Authors:  Timothy C Brand; Javier Hernandez; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Joseph W Basler; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Exosomes as biomarker enriched microvesicles: characterization of exosomal proteins derived from a panel of prostate cell lines with distinct AR phenotypes.

Authors:  Elham Hosseini-Beheshti; Steven Pham; Hans Adomat; Na Li; Emma S Tomlinson Guns
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Promoter hypermethylation of SOX11 correlates with adverse clinicopathological features of human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Apiwat Pugongchai; Andrey Bychkov; Pichet Sampatanukul
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  A comparison of the diagnostic performance of systematic versus ultrasound-guided biopsies of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Hilco van Moerkerk; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Ferdinand Frauscher; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Confronting the Christmas of our health care discontent.

Authors:  Steven Lewis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  The SWI/SNF ATPase Brm is a gatekeeper of proliferative control in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hui Shen; Nathan Powers; Nitin Saini; Clay E S Comstock; Ankur Sharma; Katherine Weaver; Monica P Revelo; William Gerald; Erin Williams; Walter J Jessen; Bruce J Aronow; Gary Rosson; Bernard Weissman; Christian Muchardt; Moshe Yaniv; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Natural history of small index lesions suspicious for prostate cancer on multiparametric MRI: recommendations for interval imaging follow-up.

Authors:  Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Barış Türkbey; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Anthony N Hoang; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Lambros Stamatakis; Hong Truong; Jeffrey W Nix; Srinivas Vourganti; Kinzya B Grant; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  Direct kinetic fingerprinting and digital counting of single protein molecules.

Authors:  Tanmay Chatterjee; Achim Knappik; Erin Sandford; Muneesh Tewari; Sung Won Choi; William B Strong; Evan P Thrush; Kenneth J Oh; Ning Liu; Nils G Walter; Alexander Johnson-Buck
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Identification and confirmation of biomarkers using an integrated platform for quantitative analysis of glycoproteins and their glycosylations.

Authors:  Yashu Liu; Jintang He; Chen Li; Ricardo Benitez; Sherry Fu; Jorge Marrero; David M Lubman
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 10.  Advances in urinary proteome analysis and biomarker discovery in pediatric renal disease.

Authors:  Cécile Caubet; Chrystelle Lacroix; Stéphane Decramer; Jens Drube; Jochen H H Ehrich; Harald Mischak; Jean-Loup Bascands; Joost P Schanstra
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.