Literature DB >> 17451744

HotPatch: a statistical approach to finding biologically relevant features on protein surfaces.

Frank K Pettit1, Emiko Bare, Albert Tsai, James U Bowie.   

Abstract

We describe a fully automated algorithm for finding functional sites on protein structures. Our method finds surface patches of unusual physicochemical properties on protein structures, and estimates the patches' probability of overlapping functional sites. Other methods for predicting the locations of specific types of functional sites exist, but in previous analyses, it has been difficult to compare methods when they are applied to different types of sites. Thus, we introduce a new statistical framework that enables rigorous comparisons of the usefulness of different physicochemical properties for predicting virtually any kind of functional site. The program's statistical models were trained for 11 individual properties (electrostatics, concavity, hydrophobicity, etc.) and for 15 neural network combination properties, all optimized and tested on 15 diverse protein functions. To simulate what to expect if the program were run on proteins of unknown function, as might arise from structural genomics, we tested it on 618 proteins of diverse mixed functions. In the higher-scoring top half of all predictions, a functional residue could typically be found within the first 1.7 residues chosen at random. The program may or may not use partial information about the protein's function type as an input, depending on which statistical model the user chooses to employ. If function type is used as an additional constraint, prediction accuracy usually increases, and is particularly good for enzymes, DNA-interacting sites, and oligomeric interfaces. The program can be accessed online (at http://hotpatch.mbi.ucla.edu).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17451744      PMCID: PMC2034327          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  60 in total

1.  Protein structural alignments and functional genomics.

Authors:  J A Irving; J C Whisstock; A M Lesk
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2001-02-15

Review 2.  Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis.

Authors:  J Skolnick; J S Fetrow; A Kolinski
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  ConSurf: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information.

Authors:  A Armon; D Graur; N Ben-Tal
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  From structure to function: approaches and limitations.

Authors:  J M Thornton; A E Todd; D Milburn; N Borkakoti; C A Orengo
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-11

5.  Structural genomics in North America.

Authors:  T C Terwilliger
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-11

6.  An overview of structural genomics.

Authors:  S K Burley
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-11

7.  Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state.

Authors:  H Ponstingl; K Henrick; J M Thornton
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-10-01

8.  Structural proteomics of an archaeon.

Authors:  D Christendat; A Yee; A Dharamsi; Y Kluger; A Savchenko; J R Cort; V Booth; C D Mackereth; V Saridakis; I Ekiel; G Kozlov; K L Maxwell; N Wu; L P McIntosh; K Gehring; M A Kennedy; A R Davidson; E F Pai; M Gerstein; A M Edwards; C H Arrowsmith
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-10

9.  Using a neural network and spatial clustering to predict the location of active sites in enzymes.

Authors:  Alex Gutteridge; Gail J Bartlett; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Membrane binding of peptides containing both basic and aromatic residues. Experimental studies with peptides corresponding to the scaffolding region of caveolin and the effector region of MARCKS.

Authors:  A Arbuzova; L Wang; J Wang; G Hangyás-Mihályné; D Murray; B Honig; S McLaughlin
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  35 in total

1.  Prediction of ligand-binding sites of proteins by molecular docking calculation for a random ligand library.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Fukunishi; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Conformational basis for substrate recruitment in protein tyrosine phosphatase 10D.

Authors:  Lalima L Madan; B Gopal
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Structural imperatives impose diverse evolutionary constraints on helical membrane proteins.

Authors:  Amit Oberai; Nathan H Joh; Frank K Pettit; James U Bowie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structural differences between thermophilic and mesophilic membrane proteins.

Authors:  Alejandro D Meruelo; Seong Kyu Han; Sanguk Kim; James U Bowie
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  Evolution: a guide to perturb protein function and networks.

Authors:  Olivier Lichtarge; Angela Wilkins
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Computational design of membrane proteins using RosettaMembrane.

Authors:  Amanda M Duran; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  A study of interface roughness of heteromeric obligate and non-obligate protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Indrani Bera; Somak Ray
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2009-11-18

8.  Molecular surface mesh generation by filtering electron density map.

Authors:  Joachim Giard; Benoît Macq
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2010-04-12

9.  The ConSurf-DB: pre-calculated evolutionary conservation profiles of protein structures.

Authors:  Ofir Goldenberg; Elana Erez; Guy Nimrod; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Study of human RIG-I polymorphisms identifies two variants with an opposite impact on the antiviral immune response.

Authors:  Julien Pothlichet; Anne Burtey; Andriy V Kubarenko; Gregory Caignard; Brigitte Solhonne; Frédéric Tangy; Meriem Ben-Ali; Lluis Quintana-Murci; Andrea Heinzmann; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Pierre-Olivier Vidalain; Alexander N R Weber; Michel Chignard; Mustapha Si-Tahar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.