Literature DB >> 17444611

Effect of cell size and shape on single-cell electroporation.

Aparna Agarwal1, Imants Zudans, Emily A Weber, Jessica Olofsson, Owe Orwar, Stephen G Weber.   

Abstract

Single-cell electroporation was performed using electrolyte-filled capillaries on fluorescently labeled A549 cells. Cells were exposed to brief pulses (50-300 ms) at various cell-capillary tip distances. Cell viability and electroporation success were measured. In order to understand the variability in single-cell electroporation, logistic regression was used to determine whether the probabilities of cell survival and electroporation depend on experimental conditions and cell properties. Both experimental conditions and cell properties (size and shape) have a significant effect on the outcome. Finite element simulations were used to compare bulk electroporation to single-cell electroporation in terms of cell size and shape. Cells are more readily permeabilized and are more likely to survive if they are large and hemispherical as opposed to small and ellipsoidal with a high aspect ratio. The dependence of the maximum transmembrane potential across the cell membrane on cell size is much weaker than it is for bulk electroporation. Observed survival probabilities are related to the calculated fraction of the cell's surface area that is electroporated. Observed success of electroporation is related to the maximum transmembrane potential achieved.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17444611      PMCID: PMC2532982          DOI: 10.1021/ac062049e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  32 in total

1.  Single-cell electroporation.

Authors:  James L Rae; Richard A Levis
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  Effect of electric field induced transmembrane potential on spheroidal cells: theory and experiment.

Authors:  Blaz Valic; Muriel Golzio; Mojca Pavlin; Anne Schatz; Cecile Faurie; Bruno Gabriel; Justin Teissié; Marie-Pierre Rols; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 1.733

3.  Microfluidic device for single-cell analysis.

Authors:  Aaron R Wheeler; William R Throndset; Rebecca J Whelan; Andrew M Leach; Richard N Zare; Yish Hann Liao; Kevin Farrell; Ian D Manger; Antoine Daridon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  A single cell electroporation chip.

Authors:  Michelle Khine; Adrian Lau; Cristian Ionescu-Zanetti; Jeonggi Seo; Luke P Lee
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 6.799

5.  Single-cell analysis by electrochemical detection with a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Fangquan Xia; Wenrui Jin; Xuefeng Yin; Zhaolun Fang
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 4.759

6.  Cellular membrane potentials induced by alternating fields.

Authors:  C Grosse; H P Schwan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Laser-micropipet combination for single-cell analysis.

Authors:  C E Sims; G D Meredith; T B Krasieva; M W Berns; B J Tromberg; N L Allbritton
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Quantification of oxidative/nitrosative modification of CYS(34) in human serum albumin using a fluorescence-based SDS-PAGE assay.

Authors:  James P Fabisiak; Andrey Sedlov; Valerian E Kagan
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.401

9.  Pro-oxidant and antioxidant mechanisms of etoposide in HL-60 cells: role of myeloperoxidase.

Authors:  V E Kagan; A I Kuzmenko; Y Y Tyurina; A A Shvedova; T Matsura; J C Yalowich
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Enzyme loading of electrically homogeneous human red blood cell ghosts prepared by dielelctric breakdown.

Authors:  U Zimmermann; F Riemann; G Pilwat
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1976-06-17
View more
  27 in total

1.  Control of the release of freely diffusing molecules in single-cell electroporation.

Authors:  Aparna Agarwal; Manyan Wang; Jessica Olofsson; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Enhancing Irreversible Electroporation by Manipulating Cellular Biophysics with a Molecular Adjuvant.

Authors:  Jill W Ivey; Eduardo L Latouche; Megan L Richards; Glenn J Lesser; Waldemar Debinski; Rafael V Davalos; Scott S Verbridge
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Nanofountain probe electroporation (NFP-E) of single cells.

Authors:  Wonmo Kang; Fazel Yavari; Majid Minary-Jolandan; Juan P Giraldo-Vela; Asmahan Safi; Rebecca L McNaughton; Victor Parpoil; Horacio D Espinosa
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Bystander Effect Induced by Electroporation is Possibly Mediated by Microvesicles and Dependent on Pulse Amplitude, Repetition Frequency and Cell Type.

Authors:  Ajda Prevc; Apolonija Bedina Zavec; Maja Cemazar; Veronika Kloboves-Prevodnik; Monika Stimac; Vesna Todorovic; Primoz Strojan; Gregor Sersa
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  Dependence of Electroporation Detection Threshold on Cell Radius: An Explanation to Observations Non Compatible with Schwan's Equation Model.

Authors:  Borja Mercadal; P Thomas Vernier; Antoni Ivorra
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Selective susceptibility to nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) across different human cell types.

Authors:  Elena C Gianulis; Chantelle Labib; Gintautas Saulis; Vitalij Novickij; Olga N Pakhomova; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 7.  Improving cancer therapies by targeting the physical and chemical hallmarks of the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Jill W Ivey; Mohammad Bonakdar; Akanksha Kanitkar; Rafael V Davalos; Scott S Verbridge
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  Nonendocytic delivery of functional engineered nanoparticles into the cytoplasm of live cells using a novel, high-throughput microfluidic device.

Authors:  Jungmin Lee; Armon Sharei; Woo Young Sim; Andrea Adamo; Robert Langer; Klavs F Jensen; Moungi G Bawendi
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 9.  Microscale electroporation: challenges and perspectives for clinical applications.

Authors:  Won Gu Lee; Utkan Demirci; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Single-cell transfection by electroporation using an electrolyte/plasmid-filled capillary.

Authors:  Manyan Wang; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.