Literature DB >> 27170140

Dependence of Electroporation Detection Threshold on Cell Radius: An Explanation to Observations Non Compatible with Schwan's Equation Model.

Borja Mercadal1, P Thomas Vernier2, Antoni Ivorra3.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted that electroporation occurs when the cell transmembrane voltage induced by an external applied electric field reaches a threshold. Under this assumption, in order to trigger electroporation in a spherical cell, Schwan's equation leads to an inversely proportional relationship between the cell radius and the minimum magnitude of the applied electric field. And, indeed, several publications report experimental evidences of an inverse relationship between the cell size and the field required to achieve electroporation. However, this dependence is not always observed or is not as steep as predicted by Schwan's equation. The present numerical study attempts to explain these observations that do not fit Schwan's equation on the basis of the interplay between cell membrane conductivity, permeability, and transmembrane voltage. For that, a single cell in suspension was modeled and the electric field necessary to achieve electroporation with a single pulse was determined according to two effectiveness criteria: a specific permeabilization level, understood as the relative area occupied by the pores during the pulse, and a final intracellular concentration of a molecule due to uptake by diffusion after the pulse, during membrane resealing. The results indicate that plausible model parameters can lead to divergent dependencies of the electric field threshold on the cell radius. These divergent dependencies were obtained through both criteria and using two different permeabilization models. This suggests that the interplay between cell membrane conductivity, permeability, and transmembrane voltage might be the cause of results which are noncompatible with the Schwan's equation model.

Keywords:  Cell membrane; Cell size; Electroporation; Finite element modeling; Membrane conductivity; Transmembrane transport

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27170140     DOI: 10.1007/s00232-016-9907-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Membr Biol        ISSN: 0022-2631            Impact factor:   1.843


  67 in total

1.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell. I. Effects Of field strength and rest potential.

Authors:  K A DeBruin; W Krassowska
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Filtration, diffusion, and molecular sieving through porous cellulose membranes.

Authors:  E M RENKIN
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1954-11-20       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  The current-voltage relation for electropores with conductivity gradients.

Authors:  Jianbo Li; Hao Lin
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.800

4.  Electrical modeling of the influence of medium conductivity on electroporation.

Authors:  Antoni Ivorra; Julien Villemejane; Lluis M Mir
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Molecular dynamics simulations of ion conductance in field-stabilized nanoscale lipid electropores.

Authors:  Ming-Chak Ho; Maura Casciola; Zachary A Levine; P Thomas Vernier
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Theoretical and experimental analysis of conductivity, ion diffusion and molecular transport during cell electroporation--relation between short-lived and long-lived pores.

Authors:  Mojca Pavlin; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.373

7.  Kinetics of permeability changes induced by electric impulses in chromaffin granules.

Authors:  P Lindner; E Neumann; K Rosenheck
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1977-04-22       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Comparison of the effects of the repetition rate between microsecond and nanosecond pulses: electropermeabilization-induced electro-desensitization?

Authors:  A Silve; A Guimerà Brunet; B Al-Sakere; A Ivorra; L M Mir
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-02-28

9.  The relationship between electropermeabilization and cell cycle and cell size of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shinichiro Hojo; Kenji Shimizu; Hironobu Yositake; Masafumi Muraji; Hiroaki Tsujimoto; Wataru Tatebe
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.935

10.  Giant lipid vesicles under electric field pulses assessed by non invasive imaging.

Authors:  Chloé Mauroy; Thomas Portet; Martin Winterhalder; Elisabeth Bellard; Marie-Claire Blache; Justin Teissié; Andreas Zumbusch; Marie-Pierre Rols
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.373

View more
  2 in total

1.  Avoiding nerve stimulation in irreversible electroporation: a numerical modeling study.

Authors:  Borja Mercadal; Christopher B Arena; Rafael V Davalos; Antoni Ivorra
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Short microsecond pulses achieve homogeneous electroporation of elongated biological cells irrespective of their orientation in electric field.

Authors:  Janja Dermol-Černe; Tina Batista Napotnik; Matej Reberšek; Damijan Miklavčič
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.