Literature DB >> 28746857

Enhancing Irreversible Electroporation by Manipulating Cellular Biophysics with a Molecular Adjuvant.

Jill W Ivey1, Eduardo L Latouche2, Megan L Richards1, Glenn J Lesser3, Waldemar Debinski3, Rafael V Davalos4, Scott S Verbridge5.   

Abstract

Pulsed electric fields applied to cells have been used as an invaluable research tool to enhance delivery of genes or other intracellular cargo, as well as for tumor treatment via electrochemotherapy or tissue ablation. These processes involve the buildup of charge across the cell membrane, with subsequent alteration of transmembrane potential that is a function of cell biophysics and geometry. For traditional electroporation parameters, larger cells experience a greater degree of membrane potential alteration. However, we have recently demonstrated that the nuclear/cytoplasm ratio (NCR), rather than cell size, is a key predictor of response for cells treated with high-frequency irreversible electroporation (IRE). In this study, we leverage a targeted molecular therapy, ephrinA1, known to markedly collapse the cytoplasm of cells expressing the EphA2 receptor, to investigate how biophysical cellular changes resulting from NCR manipulation affect the response to IRE at varying frequencies. We present evidence that the increase in the NCR mitigates the cell death response to conventional electroporation pulsed-electric fields (∼100 μs), consistent with the previously noted size dependence. However, this same molecular treatment enhanced the cell death response to high-frequency electric fields (∼1 μs). This finding demonstrates the importance of considering cellular biophysics and frequency-dependent effects in developing electroporation protocols, and our approach provides, to our knowledge, a novel and direct experimental methodology to quantify the relationship between cell morphology, pulse frequency, and electroporation response. Finally, this novel, to our knowledge, combinatorial approach may provide a paradigm to enhance in vivo tumor ablation through a molecular manipulation of cellular morphology before IRE application.
Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28746857      PMCID: PMC5529610          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  41 in total

1.  Pulsed electric fields for selection of hematopoietic cells and depletion of tumor cell contaminants.

Authors:  H M Eppich; R Foxall; K Gaynor; D Dombkowski; N Miura; T Cheng; S Silva-Arrieta; R H Evans; J A Mangano; F I Preffer; D T Scadden
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Theoretical considerations of tissue electroporation with high-frequency bipolar pulses.

Authors:  Christopher B Arena; Michael B Sano; Marissa Nichole Rylander; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Eph receptors and ephrins in cancer: bidirectional signalling and beyond.

Authors:  Elena B Pasquale
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Imaging guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation: ultrasound and immunohistological correlation.

Authors:  Edward W Lee; Christopher T Loh; Stephen T Kee
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08

5.  EphA2 as a glioma-associated antigen: a novel target for glioma vaccines.

Authors:  Manabu Hatano; Junichi Eguchi; Tomohide Tatsumi; Naruo Kuwashima; Jill E Dusak; Michel S Kinch; Ian F Pollack; Ronald L Hamilton; Walter J Storkus; Hideho Okada
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  In vivo characterization and numerical simulation of prostate properties for non-thermal irreversible electroporation ablation.

Authors:  Robert E Neal; Jeremy L Millar; Helen Kavnoudias; Peter Royce; Franklin Rosenfeldt; Alan Pham; Ryan Smith; Rafael V Davalos; Kenneth R Thomson
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Increased expression of EphA2 correlates with adverse outcome in primary and recurrent glioblastoma multiforme patients.

Authors:  Lin-Fang Wang; Emmanouil Fokas; Michael Bieker; Frank Rose; Peter Rexin; Yuan Zhu; Axel Pagenstecher; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Han-Xiang An
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Variations in the nuclear-cytoplasmic ration during epithelial differentiation in experimental oral carcinogenesis.

Authors:  F H White; K Gohari
Journal:  J Oral Pathol       Date:  1981-06

9.  EphA2 overexpression correlates with poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Miyazaki; Hiroyuki Kato; Minoru Fukuchi; Masanobu Nakajima; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Expression of EphA2 in human astrocytic tumors: correlation with pathologic grade, proliferation and apoptosis.

Authors:  Xia Li; Yingmei Wang; Yazhou Wang; Haining Zhen; Hao Yang; Zhou Fei; Jianning Zhang; Weiping Liu; Yangang Wang; Xiang Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2007-05-21
View more
  7 in total

1.  Influence of Pulsed Electric Fields and Mitochondria-Cytoskeleton Interactions on Cell Respiration.

Authors:  Ishan Goswami; Justin B Perry; Mitchell E Allen; David A Brown; Michael R von Spakovsky; Scott S Verbridge
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Normal and fibrotic liver parenchyma respond differently to irreversible electroporation.

Authors:  Chenang Lyu; Maya Lopez-Ichikawa; Boris Rubinsky; Tammy T Chang
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Irreversible Electroporation Enhanced by Radiofrequency Ablation: An In Vitro and Computational Study in a 3D Liver Tumor Model.

Authors:  Zheng Fang; Huimin Mao; Michael A J Moser; Wenjun Zhang; Zhiqin Qian; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Dynamics of Cell Death After Conventional IRE and H-FIRE Treatments.

Authors:  Borja Mercadal; Natalie Beitel-White; Kenneth N Aycock; Quim Castellví; Rafael V Davalos; Antoni Ivorra
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Chemical Enhancement of Irreversible Electroporation: A Review and Future Suggestions.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Michael A J Moser; Yigang Luo; Wenjun Zhang; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01

6.  Electrochemotherapy Using Doxorubicin and Nanosecond Electric Field Pulses: A Pilot in Vivo Study.

Authors:  Vitalij Novickij; Veronika Malyško; Augustinas Želvys; Austėja Balevičiūtė; Auksė Zinkevičienė; Jurij Novickij; Irutė Girkontaitė
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 7.  Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Elise P W Jenkins; Alina Finch; Magda Gerigk; Iasonas F Triantis; Colin Watts; George G Malliaras
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 16.806

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.