Literature DB >> 19351139

Single-cell transfection by electroporation using an electrolyte/plasmid-filled capillary.

Manyan Wang1, Owe Orwar, Stephen G Weber.   

Abstract

Single-cell transfection of adherent cells has been accomplished using single-cell electroporation (SCEP) with a pulled capillary. HEPES-buffered physiological saline solution containing pEGFP plasmid at a low concentration (0.16 approximately 0.78 microg/microL) filled a 15 cm long capillary with a tip opening of 2 microm. The electric field is applied to individual cells by bringing the tip close to the cell and subsequently applying one or two brief electric pulses. Many individual cells can thus be transfected with a small volume of plasmid-containing solution (approximately 1 microL). The extent of electroporation is determined by measuring the percentage loss of freely diffusing thiols (chiefly reduced glutathione) that have been derivatized with the fluorogenic ThioGlo 1. A mass transport model is used to fit the time-dependent fluorescence intensity decay in the target cells. The fits, which are excellent, yield the electroporation-induced fluorescence loss at steady state and the mass transfer rate through the electroporated cell membrane. Steady-state fluorescence loss ranged approximately from 0 to about 80% (based on the fluorescence intensity before electroporation). For the cells having a loss of thiol-ThioGlo 1 fluorescence intensity greater than 10% and mass transfer rate greater than 0.03 s(-1), EGFP fluorescence is observed after 24 h. The EGFP fluorescence is increased at 48 h. With a loss smaller than 10% and a mass transfer rate smaller than 0.03 s(-1), no EGFP fluorescence is detected. Thus, transfection success is closely related to the small molecule mass transport dynamics as indicated by the loss of fluorescence from thiol-ThioGlo 1 conjugates. The EGFP expression is weaker than bulk lipid-mediated transfection, as indicated by the EGFP fluorescence intensities. However, the success with the single-cell approach is considerably greater than lipid-mediated transfection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19351139      PMCID: PMC2739742          DOI: 10.1021/ac900265f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  32 in total

1.  Single-cell electroporation for gene transfer in vivo.

Authors:  K Haas; W C Sin; A Javaherian; Z Li; H T Cline
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Micro-injection-mediated hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy.

Authors:  B R Davis; D B Brown; N L Prokopishyn; J Yannariello-Brown
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2000-08

3.  Theoretical modeling of the effects of shock duration, frequency, and strength on the degree of electroporation.

Authors:  A O Bilska; K A DeBruin; W Krassowska
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.373

4.  Numerical calculations of single-cell electroporation with an electrolyte-filled capillary.

Authors:  Imants Zudans; Aparna Agarwal; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Effect of cell size and shape on single-cell electroporation.

Authors:  Aparna Agarwal; Imants Zudans; Emily A Weber; Jessica Olofsson; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Single-cell electroporation of adult sensory neurons for gene screening with RNA interference mechanism.

Authors:  Mathieu Boudes; Simon Pieraut; Jean Valmier; Patrick Carroll; Frédérique Scamps
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Microfluidic electroporation for delivery of small molecules and genes into cells using a common DC power supply.

Authors:  Hsiang-Yu Wang; Chang Lu
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Targeted patch-clamp recordings and single-cell electroporation of unlabeled neurons in vivo.

Authors:  Kazuo Kitamura; Benjamin Judkewitz; Masanobu Kano; Winfried Denk; Michael Häusser
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Space and time-resolved gene expression experiments on cultured mammalian cells by a single-cell electroporation microarray.

Authors:  S Vassanelli; L Bandiera; M Borgo; G Cellere; L Santoni; C Bersani; M Salamon; M Zaccolo; L Lorenzelli; S Girardi; M Maschietto; M Dal Maschio; A Paccagnella
Journal:  N Biotechnol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.079

Review 10.  Application of electroporation gene therapy: past, current, and future.

Authors:  Lluis M Mir
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008
View more
  7 in total

1.  Nanochannel electroporation delivers precise amounts of biomolecules into living cells.

Authors:  Pouyan E Boukany; Andrew Morss; Wei-Ching Liao; Brian Henslee; Hyunchul Jung; Xulang Zhang; Bo Yu; Xinmei Wang; Yun Wu; Lei Li; Keliang Gao; Xin Hu; Xi Zhao; O Hemminger; Wu Lu; Gregory P Lafyatis; L James Lee
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Optoporation and genetic manipulation of cells using femtosecond laser pulses.

Authors:  Andrew A Davis; Matthew J Farrar; Nozomi Nishimura; Moonsoo M Jin; Chris B Schaffer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Investigation of Optimized Treatment Conditions for Acoustic-Transfection Technique for Intracellular Delivery of Macromolecules.

Authors:  Min Gon Kim; Sangpil Yoon; Chi Tat Chiu; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Monoclonal Cell Line Generation and CRISPR/Cas9 Manipulation via Single-Cell Electroporation.

Authors:  Ruiguo Yang; Vincent Lemaître; Changjin Huang; Abbas Haddadi; Rebecca McNaughton; Horacio D Espinosa
Journal:  Small       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 13.281

5.  Selective gene transfection of individual cells in vitro with plasmonic nanobubbles.

Authors:  Ekaterina Y Lukianova-Hleb; Adam P Samaniego; Jianguo Wen; Leonid S Metelitsa; Chung-Che Chang; Dmitri O Lapotko
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Nanofountain Probe Electroporation Enables Versatile Single-Cell Intracellular Delivery and Investigation of Postpulse Electropore Dynamics.

Authors:  Samba Shiva Prasad Nathamgari; Nibir Pathak; Vincent Lemaitre; Prithvijit Mukherjee; Joseph J Muldoon; Chian-Yu Peng; Tammy McGuire; Joshua N Leonard; John A Kessler; Horacio Dante Espinosa
Journal:  Small       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 7.  Microfluidic electroporation for cellular analysis and delivery.

Authors:  Tao Geng; Chang Lu
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.799

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.