Literature DB >> 17441255

A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.

Jun Zhou1, Bo Zhao, Wei Zhao.   

Abstract

In breast tomosynthesis there is a compromise between resolution, noise, and acquisition speed for a given glandular dose. The purpose of the present work is to develop a simulation platform to investigate the potential imaging performance for the many possible tomosynthesis system configurations. The simulation platform was used to investigate the dependence of image blur and signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) for several different tomosynthesis acquisition configurations. Simulated projections of a slanted thin tungsten wire placed in different object planes were modified according to the detector's modulation transfer function (MTF), with or without pixel binning. In addition, the focal spot blur (FSB), which depends on the location of the wire, the system geometry, the source-detector movement speed, and the exposure time, was also incorporated into the projections. Both expectation maximization (EM) and filtered back projection (FBP) based algorithms were used for 3D image reconstruction. The in-plane MTF was calculated from the reconstructed image of the wire. To evaluate the noise performance, simulated noiseless projections of calcification and tumor in uniform breast tissue were modified with the noise power spectrum (NPS) calculated from a cascaded linear system model for the detector for a given x-ray dose. The SDNR of the reconstructed images was calculated with different tomosynthesis configurations, e.g., pixel binning, view number, and angular range. Our results showed that for a source-to-imager distance (SID) of 66 cm, pixel binning (2 x 2) caused more degradation to the in-plane MTF than the blur caused by the moving focal spot and reconstruction. The in-depth resolution can be improved by increasing the angular range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17441255     DOI: 10.1118/1.2558160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  27 in total

1.  High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.

Authors:  Xin Qian; Andrew Tucker; Emily Gidcumb; Jing Shan; Guang Yang; Xiomara Calderon-Colon; Shabana Sultana; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Derrek Spronk; Frank Sprenger; Yiheng Zhang; Don Kennedy; Tom Farbizio; Zhenxue Jing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Jun Zhou; Yue-Houng Hu; Thomas Mertelmeier; Jasmina Ludwig; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach.

Authors:  Yue-Houng Hu; Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Penalized maximum likelihood reconstruction for improved microcalcification detection in breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Mini Das; Howard C Gifford; J Michael O'Connor; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Alicia Toledano; Cosimo di Maggio; Enrica Baldan; Elisabetta Bezzon; Manuela La Grassa; Luigi Pescarini; Ilaria Polico; Alessandro Proietti; Aida Toffoli; Pier Carlo Muzzio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Tomosynthesis imaging: at a translational crossroads.

Authors:  James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.