Günther Maderbacher1, Armin Keshmiri2, Florian Zeman3, Joachim Grifka2, Clemens Baier2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Guenther.Maderbacher@klinik.uni-regensburg.de. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 3. Center of Clinical Studies, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Reconstructing the natural joint line in knee revision surgery improves clinical and functional outcome but may be challenging when both cartilage and bone were removed during previous operations. Assessing joint lines (JLs) by means of bony landmarks is inadvisable because of large variations in human anatomy. Because of the inherent symmetry of the human body, we hypothesised that JLs may be directly assessed by measuring the distances from the bony landmarks to the JL of the contralateral knee by means of radiographic images. METHODS: Using scaled weight-bearing radiographs in anteroposterior view of both knees, two independent observers measured the distances from the fibular head, the medial and lateral epicondyle, and the adductor tubercle to the JL. A two-sided p value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred knees of 100 patients (50 men and 50 women) were examined. For the fibular head, the mean difference between the treated and the control knee was 0.0 mm with narrow confidence limits ranging from -1.1 to 1.1. CONCLUSION: As a new assessment method, we have suggested to assess the JL by means of radiographs of the contralateral knee. The most precise parameter was found to be the distance between the fibular head and the JL. The level of arthritis, age, gender, visibility of the landmarks, and misalignment did not influence measurement accuracy. This parameter is the first tibia-related landmark for assessing the JL, which advantageously corresponds to the tibia-first technique in revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Study, Level II.
PURPOSE: Reconstructing the natural joint line in knee revision surgery improves clinical and functional outcome but may be challenging when both cartilage and bone were removed during previous operations. Assessing joint lines (JLs) by means of bony landmarks is inadvisable because of large variations in human anatomy. Because of the inherent symmetry of the human body, we hypothesised that JLs may be directly assessed by measuring the distances from the bony landmarks to the JL of the contralateral knee by means of radiographic images. METHODS: Using scaled weight-bearing radiographs in anteroposterior view of both knees, two independent observers measured the distances from the fibular head, the medial and lateral epicondyle, and the adductor tubercle to the JL. A two-sided p value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred knees of 100 patients (50 men and 50 women) were examined. For the fibular head, the mean difference between the treated and the control knee was 0.0 mm with narrow confidence limits ranging from -1.1 to 1.1. CONCLUSION: As a new assessment method, we have suggested to assess the JL by means of radiographs of the contralateral knee. The most precise parameter was found to be the distance between the fibular head and the JL. The level of arthritis, age, gender, visibility of the landmarks, and misalignment did not influence measurement accuracy. This parameter is the first tibia-related landmark for assessing the JL, which advantageously corresponds to the tibia-first technique in revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Study, Level II.
Entities:
Keywords:
Contralateral knee; Fibular head; Joint line; Knee revision surgery
Authors: Tilman Graulich; Caroline Kranz; Dafang Zhang; Marcus Oergel; Tarek Omar Pacha; Marco Haertle; Mohamed Omar; Christian Krettek; Martin Panzica Journal: In Vivo Date: 2020 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Giuseppe Filardo; Danilo Bruni; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Mirco Lo Presti; Ibrahim Akkawi; Maria Pia Neri; Maurilio Marcacci Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Arnaud Clavé; Goulven Le Henaff; Thomas Roger; Paul Maisongrosse; Christian Mabit; Frédéric Dubrana Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Berardo Di Matteo; Daniele Altomare; Andrea Dorotei; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Maurilio Marcacci; Elizaveta Kon; Francesco Iacono Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-01