Literature DB >> 10546611

Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty.

P F Partington1, J Sawhney, C H Rorabeck, R L Barrack, J Moore.   

Abstract

In 99 patients, 107 knee replacements were revised in two centers by two surgeons using a single revision total knee arthroplasty system. A retrospective radiographic review of joint line position before and after revision total knee arthroplasty was made, and compared with the joint line position before primary knee arthroplasty. Prospectively collected Knee Society Clinical Rating Scores were correlated with radiographic findings. The joint line position in unreplaced knee replacements averaged 16 mm, and the joint line position in knee replacements before revision surgery averaged 17 mm. The joint line was elevated by the revision total knee arthroplasty in 85 of 107 knees (79%). After the revision total knee replacement, the joint line elevation averaged 24 mm. The Knee Society Clinical Rating Score after revision surgery averaged 131 points. If the joint line position was elevated more than 8 mm, the Knee Society Clinical Rating Score averaged 125 points, if the joint line was elevated less than 8 mm, the score averaged 141 points. Joint line elevation after revision total knee replacement is a problem. Excessive elevation may result in worse clinical outcomes. Distal femoral augments should be used more often and with greater thicknesses. Standard implants used for revision surgery should have increased distal dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10546611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  62 in total

1.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique.

Authors:  Lars Perlick; Holger Bäthis; Carsten Perlick; Christian Lüring; Markus Tingart; Joachim Grifka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Soft tissue balanced navigation of total knee arthroplasties].

Authors:  C Schnurr; I Stolzenberg; J Nessler; P Eysel; P König
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  The adductor tubercle: a reliable landmark for analysing the level of the femorotibial joint line.

Authors:  Francesco Iacono; Mirco Lo Presti; Danilo Bruni; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Simone Bignozzi; Bharat Sharma; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique.

Authors:  Domenico Tigani; G Sabbioni; R Ben Ayad; M Filanti; N Rani; N Del Piccolo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The role of offset stems in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrea Baldini; Giovanni Balato; Vincenzo Franceschini
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

6.  Reliability of bony landmarks for restoration of the joint line in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elvire Servien; Darius Viskontas; Bruno M Giuffrè; Myles R J Coolican; David A Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Computer-assisted revision of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aymard de Ladoucette
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The adductor tubercle as an important landmark to determine the joint line level in total knee arthroplasty: from radiographs to surgical theatre.

Authors:  F Iacono; G F Raspugli; D Bruni; G Filardo; S Zaffagnini; W F Luetzow; M Lo Presti; I Akkawi; G M Marcheggiani Muccioli; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Joint line changes after primary total knee arthroplasty: navigated versus non-navigated.

Authors:  A Jawhar; V Shah; S Sohoni; H P Scharf
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Restoration of the distal femur impacts patellar height in revision TKA.

Authors:  Saurabh Khakharia; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.