PURPOSE: Restoring the joint line (JL) improves clinical and functional outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, anatomical landmarks to approximate the JL have been published. So far, the natural deviation of the JL 90° to the mechanical tibial axis has not been considered. Thus, we designed this study to: (1) determine the natural JL of knees in healthy persons in respect to the mechanical tibial axis, (2) validate and double-check intra-operative bony landmarks already been published in respect to the natural JL and (3) find possible correlations between distances from bony landmarks to the JL and femoral and tibial width. METHODS: Eighty MRI scans of knees of healthy persons were examined by two independent observers. Distances from the tip of the fibular head (FH), the medial (ME) and lateral (LE) epicondyles and the adductor tubercle (AT) to the JL within the medial and lateral compartment were measured. Further, we determined the orientation of the JL in respect to the mechanical axis of the tibia. Interobserver correlations were calculated. Differences were analyzed using Student's t test. Linear regression models were calculated to analyze correlations. RESULTS: Interobserver correlation was excellent. Mean JL deviation was 4.2° varus. Distance between the FH, ME, LE and AT to the JL within the medial compartment was 12.2, 33.9, 33.4 and 45.4 mm, respectively. Within in the lateral compartment, distances were 15.3, 31.0, 30.6 and 42.3 mm to the JL. Strong correlation was found between femoral width and distances from the AT, ME and LE to the JL. CONCLUSION: In TKA, the JL is usually altered due to the classic resection technique, which does not respect the natural deviation of the JL. Estimating the natural JL by adding absolute values to bony landmarks, as proposed in the literature, is not recommended. According to our data, the JL can be best estimated by adding the calculated value: 6.40 + (width femur [mm] × 0.49) to the AT.
PURPOSE: Restoring the joint line (JL) improves clinical and functional outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, anatomical landmarks to approximate the JL have been published. So far, the natural deviation of the JL 90° to the mechanical tibial axis has not been considered. Thus, we designed this study to: (1) determine the natural JL of knees in healthy persons in respect to the mechanical tibial axis, (2) validate and double-check intra-operative bony landmarks already been published in respect to the natural JL and (3) find possible correlations between distances from bony landmarks to the JL and femoral and tibial width. METHODS: Eighty MRI scans of knees of healthy persons were examined by two independent observers. Distances from the tip of the fibular head (FH), the medial (ME) and lateral (LE) epicondyles and the adductor tubercle (AT) to the JL within the medial and lateral compartment were measured. Further, we determined the orientation of the JL in respect to the mechanical axis of the tibia. Interobserver correlations were calculated. Differences were analyzed using Student's t test. Linear regression models were calculated to analyze correlations. RESULTS: Interobserver correlation was excellent. Mean JL deviation was 4.2° varus. Distance between the FH, ME, LE and AT to the JL within the medial compartment was 12.2, 33.9, 33.4 and 45.4 mm, respectively. Within in the lateral compartment, distances were 15.3, 31.0, 30.6 and 42.3 mm to the JL. Strong correlation was found between femoral width and distances from the AT, ME and LE to the JL. CONCLUSION: In TKA, the JL is usually altered due to the classic resection technique, which does not respect the natural deviation of the JL. Estimating the natural JL by adding absolute values to bony landmarks, as proposed in the literature, is not recommended. According to our data, the JL can be best estimated by adding the calculated value: 6.40 + (width femur [mm] × 0.49) to the AT.
Authors: Elvire Servien; Darius Viskontas; Bruno M Giuffrè; Myles R J Coolican; David A Parker Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2007-11-29 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Han Jun Lee; Jae Sung Lee; Ho Joong Jung; Kwang Sup Song; Jae Jun Yang; Chi Woo Park Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: G Maderbacher; A Keshmiri; J Schaumburger; F Zeman; A M Birkenbach; B Craiovan; J Grifka; C Baier Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Stefan Schroeder; Mareike Schonhoff; Maximilian Uhler; Steffen Braun; Sebastian Jaeger; Tobias Renkawitz; Jan Philippe Kretzer Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Arnaud Clavé; Goulven Le Henaff; Thomas Roger; Paul Maisongrosse; Christian Mabit; Frédéric Dubrana Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Ferdinand Wagner; Günther Maderbacher; Jan Matussek; Boris M Holzapfel; Birgit Kammer; Jochen Hubertus; Sven Anders; Sebastian Winkler; Joachim Grifka; Armin Keshmiri Journal: Adv Orthop Date: 2019-09-15
Authors: Berardo Di Matteo; Daniele Altomare; Andrea Dorotei; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Maurilio Marcacci; Elizaveta Kon; Francesco Iacono Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2021-01