Literature DB >> 17416747

Fast-X on the Z: rapid evolution of sex-linked genes in birds.

Judith E Mank1, Erik Axelsson, Hans Ellegren.   

Abstract

Theoretical work predicts natural selection to be more efficient in the fixation of beneficial mutations in X-linked genes than in autosomal genes. This "fast-X effect" should be evident by an increased ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) for sex-linked genes; however, recent studies have produced mixed support for this expectation. To make an independent test of the idea of fast-X evolution, we focused on birds, which have female heterogamety (males ZZ, females ZW), where analogous arguments would predict a fast-Z effect. We aligned 2.8 Mb of orthologous protein-coding sequence of zebra finch and chicken from 172 Z-linked and 4848 autosomal genes. Zebra finch data were in the form of EST sequences from brain cDNA libraries, while chicken genes were from the draft genome sequence. The dN/dS ratio was significantly higher for Z-linked (0.110) than for all autosomal genes (0.085; P=0.002), as well as for genes linked to similarly sized autosomes 1-10 (0.0948; P=0.04). This pattern of fast-Z was evident even after we accounted for the nonrandom distribution of male-biased genes. We also examined the nature of standing variation in the chicken protein-coding regions. The ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous polymorphism (pN/pS) did not differ significantly between genes on the Z chromosome (0.104) and on the autosomes (0.0908). In conjunction, these results suggest that evolution proceeds more quickly on the Z chromosome, where hemizygous exposure of beneficial nondominant mutations increases the rate of fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17416747      PMCID: PMC1855182          DOI: 10.1101/gr.6031907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  64 in total

1.  Sex chromosome evolution and speciation in Ficedula flycatchers.

Authors:  Glenn-Peter Saetre; Thomas Borge; Katarina Lindroos; Jon Haavie; Ben C Sheldon; Craig Primmer; Ann-Christine Syvänen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Life history and the male mutation bias.

Authors:  Anna Bartosch-Härlid; Sofia Berlin; Nick G C Smith; Anders P Møller; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Rapid evolution of male-biased gene expression in Drosophila.

Authors:  Colin D Meiklejohn; John Parsch; José M Ranz; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Battle of the Xs.

Authors:  Brian Oliver; Michael Parisi
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.345

5.  Male-biased mutation, sex linkage, and the rate of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; David W Hall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  A genomic comparison of faster-sex, faster-X, and faster-male evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Heidi Musters; Melanie A Huntley; Rama S Singh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule.

Authors:  Yun Tao; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Sex-linked mammalian sperm proteins evolve faster than autosomal ones.

Authors:  Dara G Torgerson; Rama S Singh
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Using comparative genomic data to test for fast-X evolution.

Authors:  Brian A Counterman; Daniel Ortíz-Barrientos; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Sex-dependent gene expression and evolution of the Drosophila transcriptome.

Authors:  José M Ranz; Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Colin D Meiklejohn; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  66 in total

Review 1.  Speciation genetics: current status and evolving approaches.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Johan Lindell; Niclas Backström
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The population genetics of beneficial mutations.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Sex bias and dosage compensation in the zebra finch versus chicken genomes: general and specialized patterns among birds.

Authors:  Yuichiro Itoh; Kirstin Replogle; Yong-Hwan Kim; Juli Wade; David F Clayton; Arthur P Arnold
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Heritability and genetic correlation between the sexes in a songbird sexual ornament.

Authors:  J Potti; D Canal
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Sex linkage of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes.

Authors:  G E Hill
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; James D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Effects of X-linkage and sex-biased gene expression on the rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  John F Baines; Stanley A Sawyer; Daniel L Hartl; John Parsch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  A novel olfactory receptor gene family in teleost fish.

Authors:  Luis R Saraiva; Sigrun I Korsching
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  The Population Genetics of Evolutionary Rescue in Diploids: X Chromosomal versus Autosomal Rescue.

Authors:  Robert L Unckless; H Allen Orr
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Genomic evidence for a large-Z effect.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.