Literature DB >> 32097044

The Population Genetics of Evolutionary Rescue in Diploids: X Chromosomal versus Autosomal Rescue.

Robert L Unckless, H Allen Orr.   

Abstract

Most population genetic theory assumes that populations adapt to an environmental change without a change in population size. However, environmental changes might be so severe that populations decline in size and, without adaptation, become extinct. This "evolutionary rescue" scenario differs from traditional models of adaptation in that rescue involves a race between adaptation and extinction. While most previous work has usually focused on models of evolutionary rescue in haploids, here we consider diploids. In many species, diploidy introduces a novel feature into adaptation: adaptive evolution might occur either on sex chromosomes or on autosomes. Previous studies of nonrescue adaptation revealed that the relative rates of adaptation on the X chromosome versus autosomes depend on the dominance of beneficial mutations, reflecting differences in effective population size and the efficacy of selection. Here, we extend these results to evolutionary rescue and find that, given equal-sized chromosomes, there is greater parameter space in which the X is more likely to contribute to adaptation than the autosomes relative to standard nonrescue models. We also discuss how subtle effects of dominance can increase the chance of evolutionary rescue in diploids when absolute heterozygote fitness is close to 1. These effects do not arise in standard nonrescue models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; autosomes; environmental change; evolutionary rescue; sex chromosomes

Year:  2020        PMID: 32097044      PMCID: PMC7252526          DOI: 10.1086/707139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  21 in total

1.  Male-biased mutation, sex linkage, and the rate of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; David W Hall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Sex: differences in mutation, recombination, selection, gene flow, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Philip W Hedrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Effective population size and the faster-X effect: an extended model.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Effective population size and the Faster-X effect: empirical results and their interpretation.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Beatriz Vicoso; Sofia Berlin; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Evolutionary rescue in randomly mating, selfing, and clonal populations.

Authors:  Hildegard Uecker
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Adaptation and maladaptation in selfing and outcrossing species: new mutations versus standing variation.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin; Joëlle Ronfort
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Bounds to parapatric speciation: A Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibility model involving autosomes, X chromosomes, and mitochondria.

Authors:  Ilse Höllinger; Joachim Hermisson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  The population genetics of evolutionary rescue.

Authors:  H Allen Orr; Robert L Unckless
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Evolutionary rescue in populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens across an antibiotic gradient.

Authors:  Johan Ramsayer; Oliver Kaltz; Michael E Hochberg
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.