Literature DB >> 15119449

Using comparative genomic data to test for fast-X evolution.

Brian A Counterman1, Daniel Ortíz-Barrientos, Mohamed A F Noor.   

Abstract

Genes may acquire nonsynonymous substitutions more rapidly when X-linked than when autosomal, but evidence for "fast-X evolution" has been elusive. Fast-X evolution could explain the disproportionate contribution of X-linked genes to hybrid sterility and other traits. Here, we use a comparative genomic approach, with sequences of 30-110 genes in four Drosophila species, to test for fast-X evolution. Specifically, the 3L autosome arm in D. melanogaster and D. simulans is homologous to the right arm of the X chromosome in D. pseudoobscura and D. miranda. We executed two paired comparisons to determine how often genes on this chromosome arm exhibit higher rates of nonsynonymous substitution in the D. pseudoobscura species group, as predicted by fast-X evolution. We found a statistically significant pattern consistent with fast-X evolution in one comparison and a similar trend in the other comparison. Variation in functional constraints across genes may have masked the signature of fast-X evolution in some previous studies, and we conclude paired comparisons are more powerful for examining rates of evolution of genes when X-linked over autosomal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15119449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  33 in total

1.  Patterns of selection on synonymous and nonsynonymous variants in Drosophila miranda.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Xulio Maside; Soojin Yi; Anna L Grant; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  The population genetics of beneficial mutations.

Authors:  H Allen Orr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A pseudohitchhiking model of X vs. autosomal diversity.

Authors:  Andrea J Betancourt; Yuseob Kim; H Allen Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Weak selection revealed by the whole-genome comparison of the X chromosome and autosomes of human and chimpanzee.

Authors:  Jian Lu; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  X-linked genes evolve higher codon bias in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Jerel C Davis; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  A genomic comparison of faster-sex, faster-X, and faster-male evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Heidi Musters; Melanie A Huntley; Rama S Singh
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 7.  Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The molecular basis of speciation: from patterns to processes, rules to mechanisms.

Authors:  Rob J Kulathinal; Rama S Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Effects of X-linkage and sex-biased gene expression on the rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  John F Baines; Stanley A Sawyer; Daniel L Hartl; John Parsch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Strong evidence for lineage and sequence specificity of substitution rates and patterns in Drosophila.

Authors:  Nadia D Singh; Peter F Arndt; Andrew G Clark; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.