Literature DB >> 15112234

Battle of the Xs.

Brian Oliver1, Michael Parisi.   

Abstract

Females and males often exhibit conspicuous morphological, physiological and behavioral differences. Similarly, gene expression profiles indicate that a large portion of the genome is sex-differentially deployed, particularly in the germ line. Because males and females are so fundamentally different, each sex is likely to have a different optimal gene expression profile that is never fully achieved in either sex because of antagonistic selection in females versus males. Males are hemizygous for the X chromosome, which means that recessive male-favorable de novo mutations on the X chromosome are subject to immediate selection. In females, a recessive female-favorable mutation on one of two X chromosomes is not available for selection until it becomes frequent enough in the local population to result in homozygous individuals. Given that most mutations are recessive, one would expect that genes or alleles favoring males should accumulate on the X chromosome. Recent microarray work in Drosophila and C. elegans clearly shows the opposite. Why is the X chromosome a highly disfavored location for genes with male-biased expression in these animals? Published 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15112234     DOI: 10.1002/bies.20034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  16 in total

1.  Everything you always wanted to know about sex ... in flies.

Authors:  M N Arbeitman; Artyom Kopp; M L Siegal; M Van Doren
Journal:  Sex Dev       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 1.824

2.  Transitions between male and female heterogamety caused by sex-antagonistic selection.

Authors:  G Sander van Doorn; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Sex linkage, sex-specific selection, and the role of recombination in the evolution of sexually dimorphic gene expression.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Positive selection near an inversion breakpoint on the neo-X chromosome of Drosophila americana.

Authors:  Amy L Evans; Paulina A Mena; Bryant F McAllister
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Evolution of sex chromosomes in insects.

Authors:  Vera B Kaiser; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Cross-species comparison of Drosophila male accessory gland protein genes.

Authors:  J L Mueller; K Ravi Ram; L A McGraw; M C Bloch Qazi; E D Siggia; A G Clark; C F Aquadro; M F Wolfner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Gene content evolution on the X chromosome.

Authors:  Tatiana A Gurbich; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 5.578

9.  Fast-X on the Z: rapid evolution of sex-linked genes in birds.

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Erik Axelsson; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Adaptive evolution of proteins secreted during sperm maturation: an analysis of the mouse epididymal transcriptome.

Authors:  Matthew D Dean; Jeffrey M Good; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.