Literature DB >> 17408855

Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Camille Koppen1, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

The Colavita visual dominance effect refers to the phenomenon whereby participants presented with auditory, visual, or audiovisual stimuli in a speeded response task sometimes fail to respond to the auditory component of the bimodal targets. We conducted an experiment on the Colavita effect in which the auditory and visual components of the bimodal targets were presented from either the same or different positions (sides) at one of two eccentricities (13 degrees or 26 degrees ). Participants were presented with auditory, visual, and bimodal stimuli to which they had to respond by pressing an auditory response key, a visual response key, or both response keys, respectively. On bimodal trials, participants failed to respond to the auditory stimulus significantly more often than they failed to respond to the visual stimulus, resulting in a significant Colavita visual dominance effect. The Colavita effect was significantly larger when the stimuli were presented from the same position than when they were presented from different positions. These results provide the first empirical evidence that the Colavita effect is modulated by the spatial coincidence of the auditory and visual stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17408855     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  18 in total

1.  Reversing the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Mary Kim Ngo; Michelle L Cadieux; Scott Sinnett; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Stimulus duration influences perceived simultaneity in audiovisual temporal-order judgment.

Authors:  Lars T Boenke; Matthias Deliano; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Assessing the audiotactile Colavita effect in near and rear space.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Jess Hartcher O'Brien; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms of selective attention in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Kristjana Hysaj; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Is visual dominance modulated by the threat value of visual and auditory stimuli?

Authors:  Stefaan Van Damme; Geert Crombez; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Agnès Alsius; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A signal detection study of the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Carmel A Levitan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  When vision 'extinguishes' touch in neurologically-normal people: extending the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Jess Hartcher-O'Brien; Alberto Gallace; Benedikt Krings; Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.