Literature DB >> 17885751

Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Camille Koppen1, Agnès Alsius, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

Participants presented with auditory, visual, or bimodal audiovisual stimuli in a speeded discrimination task, fail to respond to the auditory component of bimodal targets significantly more often than to the visual component, a phenomenon known as the Colavita visual dominance effect. Given that spatial and temporal factors have recently been shown to modulate the Colavita effect, the aim of the present study, was to investigate whether semantic congruency also modulates the effect. In the three experiments reported here, participants were presented with a version of the Colavita task in which the stimulus congruency between the auditory and visual components of the bimodal targets was manipulated. That is, the auditory and visual stimuli could refer to the same or different object (in Experiments 1 and 2) or audiovisual speech event (Experiment 3). Surprisingly, semantic/stimulus congruency had no effect on the magnitude of the Colavita effect in any of the experiments, although it exerted a significant effect on certain other aspects of participants' performance. This finding contrasts with the results of other recent studies showing that semantic/stimulus congruency can affect certain multisensory interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17885751     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1120-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  L K. Tyler; H E. Moss
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance.

Authors:  Paul J Laurienti; Robert A Kraft; Joseph A Maldjian; Jonathan H Burdette; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.

Authors:  J Heron; D Whitaker; P V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  The spatial constraint in intersensory pairing: no role in temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Jean Vroomen; Mirjam Keetels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.

Authors:  K McRae; V R de Sa; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-06

8.  A further investigation of visual dominance.

Authors:  F B Colavita; D Weisberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-04

9.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
View more
  20 in total

1.  Reversing the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Mary Kim Ngo; Michelle L Cadieux; Scott Sinnett; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Semantic incongruity influences response caution in audio-visual integration.

Authors:  Benjamin Steinweg; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Assessing the audiotactile Colavita effect in near and rear space.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Jess Hartcher O'Brien; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms of selective attention in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Kristjana Hysaj; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Are crossmodal correspondences relative or absolute? Sequential effects on speeded classification.

Authors:  Riccardo Brunetti; Allegra Indraccolo; Claudia Del Gatto; Charles Spence; Valerio Santangelo
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Enhanced visual dominance in far space.

Authors:  Zhenzhu Yue; Yizhou Jiang; You Li; Pengfei Wang; Qi Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A signal detection study of the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Carmel A Levitan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Two mechanisms underlying auditory dominance: Overshadowing and response competition.

Authors:  Christopher W Robinson; Vladimir M Sloutsky
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

10.  Stimulus temporal uncertainty balances intersensory dominance.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Pi-Chun Huang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.