Literature DB >> 28808014

Adaptive benefit of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation in deaf adults.

Carly A Anderson1,2, Ian M Wiggins3,2,4, Pádraig T Kitterick3,2,5, Douglas E H Hartley3,2,4,5.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that visual language is maladaptive for hearing restoration with a cochlear implant (CI) due to cross-modal recruitment of auditory brain regions. Rehabilitative guidelines therefore discourage the use of visual language. However, neuroscientific understanding of cross-modal plasticity following cochlear implantation has been restricted due to incompatibility between established neuroimaging techniques and the surgically implanted electronic and magnetic components of the CI. As a solution to this problem, here we used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), a noninvasive optical neuroimaging method that is fully compatible with a CI and safe for repeated testing. The aim of this study was to examine cross-modal activation of auditory brain regions by visual speech from before to after implantation and its relation to CI success. Using fNIRS, we examined activation of superior temporal cortex to visual speech in the same profoundly deaf adults both before and 6 mo after implantation. Patients' ability to understand auditory speech with their CI was also measured following 6 mo of CI use. Contrary to existing theory, the results demonstrate that increased cross-modal activation of auditory brain regions by visual speech from before to after implantation is associated with better speech understanding with a CI. Furthermore, activation of auditory cortex by visual and auditory speech developed in synchrony after implantation. Together these findings suggest that cross-modal plasticity by visual speech does not exert previously assumed maladaptive effects on CI success, but instead provides adaptive benefits to the restoration of hearing after implantation through an audiovisual mechanism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implantation; cross-modal plasticity; functional near-infrared spectroscopy; superior temporal cortex; visual speech

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28808014      PMCID: PMC5617272          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1704785114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf.

Authors:  E M Finney; I Fine; K R Dobkins
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Pascale Sandmann; Norbert Dillier; Tom Eichele; Martin Meyer; Andrea Kegel; Roberto Domingo Pascual-Marqui; Valentine Leslie Marcar; Lutz Jäncke; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Anatomical guidance for functional near-infrared spectroscopy: AtlasViewer tutorial.

Authors:  Christopher M Aasted; Meryem A Yücel; Robert J Cooper; Jay Dubb; Daisuke Tsuzuki; Lino Becerra; Mike P Petkov; David Borsook; Ippeita Dan; David A Boas
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.593

4.  Model-based analysis of rapid event-related functional near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) data: a parametric validation study.

Authors:  M M Plichta; S Heinzel; A-C Ehlis; P Pauli; A J Fallgatter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators.

Authors:  J Rouger; S Lagleyre; B Fraysse; S Deneve; O Deguine; P Barone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cross-Modal Plasticity in Higher-Order Auditory Cortex of Congenitally Deaf Cats Does Not Limit Auditory Responsiveness to Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Rüdiger Land; Peter Baumhoff; Jochen Tillein; Stephen G Lomber; Peter Hubka; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Plasticity in bilateral superior temporal cortex: Effects of deafness and cochlear implantation on auditory and visual speech processing.

Authors:  Carly A Anderson; Diane S Lazard; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  A "rationalized" arcsine transform.

Authors:  G A Studebaker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1985-09

9.  Neuroimaging with near-infrared spectroscopy demonstrates speech-evoked activity in the auditory cortex of deaf children following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Alexander B G Sevy; Heather Bortfeld; Theodore J Huppert; Michael S Beauchamp; Ross E Tonini; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08
View more
  29 in total

1.  Cooperation between hearing and vision in people with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Structural neuroimaging of the altered brain stemming from pediatric and adolescent hearing loss-Scientific and clinical challenges.

Authors:  J Tilak Ratnanather
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2019-12-04

Review 3.  Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Erin Glennon; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Role of semantic context and talker variability in speech perception of cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Morgan N Parke; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Analysis methods for measuring passive auditory fNIRS responses generated by a block-design paradigm.

Authors:  Robert Luke; Eric Larson; Maureen J Shader; Hamish Innes-Brown; Lindsey Van Yper; Adrian K C Lee; Paul F Sowman; David McAlpine
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.593

Review 6.  The neural and neurocomputational bases of recovery from post-stroke aphasia.

Authors:  James D Stefaniak; Ajay D Halai; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 44.711

7.  Cortical imbalance following delayed restoration of bilateral hearing in deaf adolescents.

Authors:  Carly A Anderson; Sharon L Cushing; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.399

8.  Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in the Study of Speech and Language Impairment Across the Life Span: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lindsay K Butler; Swathi Kiran; Helen Tager-Flusberg
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Changes of the Brain Causal Connectivity Networks in Patients With Long-Term Bilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Gang Zhang; Long-Chun Xu; Min-Feng Zhang; Yue Zou; Le-Min He; Yun-Fu Cheng; Dong-Sheng Zhang; Wen-Bo Zhao; Xiao-Yan Wang; Peng-Cheng Wang; Guang-Yu Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Evaluating cortical responses to speech in children: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.

Authors:  Rachael J Lawrence; Ian M Wiggins; Jessica C Hodgson; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.