PURPOSE: To evaluate a novel automated segmentation algorithm for cup-to-disc segmentation from stereo color photographs of patients with glaucoma for the measurement of glaucoma progression. METHODS: Stereo color photographs of the optic disc were obtained by using a fixed stereo-base fundus camera in 58 eyes of 58 patients with suspected or open-angle glaucoma. Manual planimetry was performed by three glaucoma faculty members to delineate a reference standard rim and cup segmentation of all stereo pairs and by three glaucoma fellows as well. Pixel feature classification was evaluated on the stereo pairs and corresponding reference standard, by using feature computation based on simulation of photoreceptor color opponency and visual cortex simple and complex cells. An optimal subset of 12 features was used to segment all pixels in all stereo pairs, and the percentage of pixels assigned the correct class and linear cup-to-disc ratio (LCDR) estimates of the glaucoma fellows and the algorithm were compared to the reference standard. RESULTS: The algorithm was able to assign cup, rim, and background correctly to 88% of all pixels. Correlations of the LCDR estimates of glaucoma fellows with those of the reference standard were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.83), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70-0.89), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.91), respectively, whereas the correlation of the algorithm with the reference standard was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.96; n = 58). CONCLUSIONS: The pixel feature classification algorithm allows objective segmentation of the optic disc from conventional color stereo photographs automatically without human input. The performance of the disc segmentation and LCDR calculation of the algorithm was comparable to that of glaucoma fellows in training and is promising for objective evaluation of optic disc cupping.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a novel automated segmentation algorithm for cup-to-disc segmentation from stereo color photographs of patients with glaucoma for the measurement of glaucoma progression. METHODS: Stereo color photographs of the optic disc were obtained by using a fixed stereo-base fundus camera in 58 eyes of 58 patients with suspected or open-angle glaucoma. Manual planimetry was performed by three glaucoma faculty members to delineate a reference standard rim and cup segmentation of all stereo pairs and by three glaucoma fellows as well. Pixel feature classification was evaluated on the stereo pairs and corresponding reference standard, by using feature computation based on simulation of photoreceptor color opponency and visual cortex simple and complex cells. An optimal subset of 12 features was used to segment all pixels in all stereo pairs, and the percentage of pixels assigned the correct class and linear cup-to-disc ratio (LCDR) estimates of the glaucoma fellows and the algorithm were compared to the reference standard. RESULTS: The algorithm was able to assign cup, rim, and background correctly to 88% of all pixels. Correlations of the LCDR estimates of glaucoma fellows with those of the reference standard were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.83), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.70-0.89), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.91), respectively, whereas the correlation of the algorithm with the reference standard was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.96; n = 58). CONCLUSIONS: The pixel feature classification algorithm allows objective segmentation of the optic disc from conventional color stereo photographs automatically without human input. The performance of the disc segmentation and LCDR calculation of the algorithm was comparable to that of glaucoma fellows in training and is promising for objective evaluation of optic disc cupping.
Authors: Michael J Greaney; Douglas C Hoffman; David F Garway-Heath; Mamdouh Nakla; Anne L Coleman; Joseph Caprioli Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Meindert Niemeijer; Bram van Ginneken; Joes Staal; Maria S A Suttorp-Schulten; Michael D Abràmoff Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Meindert Niemeijer; Bram van Ginneken; Stephen R Russell; Maria S A Suttorp-Schulten; Michael D Abràmoff Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Gwenole Quellec; Stephen R Russell; Johanna M Seddon; Robyn Reynolds; Todd Scheetz; Vinit B Mahajan; Edwin M Stone; Michael D Abràmoff Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-11-25 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Li Tang; Randy H Kardon; Jui-Kai Wang; Mona K Garvin; Kyungmoo Lee; Michael D Abràmoff Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Li Tang; Todd E Scheetz; David A Mackey; Alex W Hewitt; John H Fingert; Young H Kwon; Gwenole Quellec; Joseph M Reinhardt; Michael D Abràmoff Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Zhihong Hu; Michael D Abràmoff; Young H Kwon; Kyungmoo Lee; Mona K Garvin Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Juan Xu; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Richard A Bilonick; Kyung R Sung; Larry Kagemann; Kelly A Townsend; Joel S Schuman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-03-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Emanuele Trucco; Alfredo Ruggeri; Thomas Karnowski; Luca Giancardo; Edward Chaum; Jean Pierre Hubschman; Bashir Al-Diri; Carol Y Cheung; Damon Wong; Michael Abràmoff; Gilbert Lim; Dinesh Kumar; Philippe Burlina; Neil M Bressler; Herbert F Jelinek; Fabrice Meriaudeau; Gwénolé Quellec; Tom Macgillivray; Bal Dhillon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Bhavna J Antony; Michael D Abràmoff; Matthew M Harper; Woojin Jeong; Elliott H Sohn; Young H Kwon; Randy Kardon; Mona K Garvin Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Michael D Abràmoff; Kyungmoo Lee; Meindert Niemeijer; Wallace L M Alward; Emily C Greenlee; Mona K Garvin; Milan Sonka; Young H Kwon Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 4.799