PURPOSE: Determining the relationships between phenotype and genotype of many disorders can improve clinical diagnoses, identify disease mechanisms, and enhance therapy. Most genetic disorders result from interaction of many genes that obscure the discovery of such relationships. The hypothesis for this study was that image analysis has the potential to enable formalized discovery of new visible phenotypes. It was tested in twins affected with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Fundus images from 43 monozygotic (MZ) and 32 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs with AMD were examined. First, soft and hard drusen were segmented. Then newly defined phenotypes were identified by using drusen distribution statistics that significantly separate MZ from DZ twins. The ACE model was used to identify the contributions of additive genetic (A), common environmental (C), and nonshared environmental (E) effects on drusen distribution phenotypes. RESULTS: Four drusen distribution characteristics significantly separated MZ from DZ twin pairs. One encoded the quantity, and the remaining three encoded the spatial distribution of drusen, achieving a zygosity prediction accuracy of 76%, 74%, 68%, and 68%. Three of the four phenotypes had a 55% to 77% genetic effect in an AE model, and the fourth phenotype showed a nonshared environmental effect (E model). CONCLUSIONS: Computational discovery of genetically determined features can reveal quantifiable AMD phenotypes that are genetically determined without explicitly linking them to specific genes. In addition, it can identify phenotypes that appear to result predominantly from environmental exposure. The approach is rapid and unbiased, suitable for large datasets, and can be used to reveal unknown phenotype-genotype relationships.
PURPOSE: Determining the relationships between phenotype and genotype of many disorders can improve clinical diagnoses, identify disease mechanisms, and enhance therapy. Most genetic disorders result from interaction of many genes that obscure the discovery of such relationships. The hypothesis for this study was that image analysis has the potential to enable formalized discovery of new visible phenotypes. It was tested in twins affected with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Fundus images from 43 monozygotic (MZ) and 32 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs with AMD were examined. First, soft and hard drusen were segmented. Then newly defined phenotypes were identified by using drusen distribution statistics that significantly separate MZ from DZ twins. The ACE model was used to identify the contributions of additive genetic (A), common environmental (C), and nonshared environmental (E) effects on drusen distribution phenotypes. RESULTS: Four drusen distribution characteristics significantly separated MZ from DZ twin pairs. One encoded the quantity, and the remaining three encoded the spatial distribution of drusen, achieving a zygosity prediction accuracy of 76%, 74%, 68%, and 68%. Three of the four phenotypes had a 55% to 77% genetic effect in an AE model, and the fourth phenotype showed a nonshared environmental effect (E model). CONCLUSIONS: Computational discovery of genetically determined features can reveal quantifiable AMD phenotypes that are genetically determined without explicitly linking them to specific genes. In addition, it can identify phenotypes that appear to result predominantly from environmental exposure. The approach is rapid and unbiased, suitable for large datasets, and can be used to reveal unknown phenotype-genotype relationships.
Authors: M Elena Martinez-Perez; Alun D Hughes; Alice V Stanton; Simon A Thom; Neil Chapman; Anil A Bharath; Kim H Parker Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Joseph Beyene; David Tritchler; Shelley B Bull; Kevin C Cartier; Gudrun Jonasdottir; Aldi T Kraja; Na Li; Nora L Nock; Elena Parkhomenko; J Sunil Rao; Catherine M Stein; Rinku Sutradhar; Sandra Waaijenborg; Ke-Sheng Wang; Yuanjia Wang; Pavel Wolkow Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Eric A Postel; Anita Agarwal; Jennifer Caldwell; Paul Gallins; Cynthia Toth; Silke Schmidt; William K Scott; Michael A Hauser; Jonathan L Haines; Margaret A Pericak-Vance Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2006-07-07 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Meindert Niemeijer; Bram van Ginneken; Stephen R Russell; Maria S A Suttorp-Schulten; Michael D Abràmoff Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: S Scott Whitmore; Elliott H Sohn; Kathleen R Chirco; Arlene V Drack; Edwin M Stone; Budd A Tucker; Robert F Mullins Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Michael B Gorin; Daniel E Weeks; Robert V Baron; Yvette P Conley; Maria C Ortube; Steven Nusinowitz Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 4.241