Literature DB >> 17380152

Stratified medicine: strategic and economic implications of combining drugs and clinical biomarkers.

Mark R Trusheim1, Ernst R Berndt, Frank L Douglas.   

Abstract

The potential to use biomarkers for identifying patients that are more likely to benefit or experience an adverse reaction in response to a given therapy, and thereby better match patients with therapies, is anticipated to have a major effect on both clinical practice and the development of new drugs and diagnostics. In this article, we consider current and emerging examples in which therapies are matched with specific patient population characteristics using clinical biomarkers - which we call stratified medicine - and discuss the implications of this approach to future product development strategies and market structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17380152     DOI: 10.1038/nrd2251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov        ISSN: 1474-1776            Impact factor:   84.694


  140 in total

Review 1.  Quantifying factors for the success of stratified medicine.

Authors:  Mark R Trusheim; Breon Burgess; Sean Xinghua Hu; Theresa Long; Steven D Averbuch; Aiden A Flynn; Alfons Lieftucht; Abhijit Mazumder; Judy Milloy; Peter M Shaw; David Swank; Jian Wang; Ernst R Berndt; Federico Goodsaid; Michael C Palmer
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Population- versus cohort-based modelling approaches.

Authors:  Olivier Ethgen; Baudouin Standaert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  What have we learned about trial design from NIMH-funded pragmatic trials?

Authors:  John March; Helena C Kraemer; Madhukar Trivedi; John Csernansky; John Davis; Terence A Ketter; Ira D Glick
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 4.  Translating transplantation tolerance in the clinic: where are we, where do we go?

Authors:  M Goldman; K Wood
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  The comparative effectiveness challenge.

Authors:  Bethan Hughes
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Assessing the value-adding impact of diagnostic-type tests on drug development and marketing.

Authors:  Edward D Blair
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.074

7.  Access to High Cost Cancer Medicines Through the Lens of an Australian Senate Inquiry-Defining the "Goods" at Stake.

Authors:  Narcyz Ghinea; Miles Little; Wendy Lipworth
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.352

8.  Protein quantitation through targeted mass spectrometry: the way out of biomarker purgatory?

Authors:  Steven A Carr; Leigh Anderson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 9.  The genetics of complex cholestatic disorders.

Authors:  Gideon M Hirschfield; Roger W Chapman; Tom H Karlsen; Frank Lammert; Konstantinos N Lazaridis; Andrew L Mason
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Personalized medicine and genomics: challenges and opportunities in assessing effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and future research priorities.

Authors:  Rena Conti; David L Veenstra; Katrina Armstrong; Lawrence J Lesko; Scott D Grosse
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.