Literature DB >> 1737889

Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.

G F Smoorenburg1.   

Abstract

Tone thresholds and speech-reception thresholds were measured in 200 individuals (400 ears) with noise-induced hearing loss. The speech-reception thresholds were measured in a quiet condition and in noise with a speech spectrum at levels of 35, 50, 65, and 80 dBA. The tone audiograms could be described by three principal components: hearing loss in the regions above 3 kHz, from 1 to 3 kHz and below 1 kHz; the speech thresholds could be described by two components: speech reception in quiet and speech reception in noise at 50-80 dBA. Hearing loss above 1 kHz was related to speech reception in noise; hearing loss at and below 1 kHz to speech reception in quiet. The correlation between the speech thresholds in quiet and in noise was only R = 0.45. An adequate predictor of the speech threshold in noise, the primary factor in the hearing handicap, was the pure-tone average at 2 and 4 kHz (PTA2,4, R = 0.72). The minimum value of the prediction error for any tone-audiometric predictor of this speech threshold was 1.2 dB (standard deviation). The prediction could not be improved by taking into account the critical ratio for low-frequency noise nor by its upward spread of masking. The prediction error is due to measurement error and to a factor common to both ears. The latter factor is ascribed to cognitive skill in speech reception. Hearing loss above 10 to 15 dB HL (hearing level) already shows an effect on the speech threshold in noise, a noticeable handicap is found at PTA2,4 = 30 dB HL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1737889     DOI: 10.1121/1.402729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Golbarg Mehraei; Frederick J Gallun; Marjorie R Leek; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of noise overexposure on tone detection in noise in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Samantha N Hauser; Jane A Burton; Evan T Mercer; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Drew J McLaughlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Relationship between consonant recognition in noise and hearing threshold.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; Jont B Allen; David M Gooler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.

Authors:  Andrea Trevino; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A comparative study of the audiological outcomes with Retro-X (semi-implantable hearing aid system) and conventional open fitting hearing aids.

Authors:  Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Stieve; Mark Winter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Golbarg Mehraei; Shihab Shamma; Frederick J Gallun; Sarah M Theodoroff; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Behavioral and neural discrimination of speech sounds after moderate or intense noise exposure in rats.

Authors:  Amanda C Reed; Tracy M Centanni; Michael S Borland; Chanel J Matney; Crystal T Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The speech intelligibility benefit of a unilateral wireless system for hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Christopher G Brennan-Jones; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.