Literature DB >> 17372195

Perturbed ATPase activity and not "close confinement" of substrate in the cis cavity affects rates of folding by tail-multiplied GroEL.

George W Farr1, Wayne A Fenton, Arthur L Horwich.   

Abstract

Folding of substrate proteins inside the sequestered and hydrophilic GroEL-GroES cis cavity favors production of the native state. Recent studies of GroEL molecules containing volume-occupying multiplications of the flexible C-terminal tail segments have been interpreted to indicate that close confinement of substrate proteins in the cavity optimizes the rate of folding: the rate of folding of a larger protein, Rubisco (51 kDa), was compromised by multiplication, whereas that of a smaller protein, rhodanese (33 kDa), was increased by tail duplication. Here, we report that this latter effect does not extend to the subunit of malate dehydrogenase (MDH), also 33 kDa. In addition, single-ring versions of tail-duplicated and triplicated molecules, comprising stable cis complexes, did not produce any acceleration of folding of rhodanese or MDH, nor did they show significant retardation of the folding of Rubisco. Tail quadruplication produced major reduction in recovery of native protein with both systems, the result of strongly reduced binding of all three substrates. When steady-state ATPase of the tail-multiplied double-ring GroELs was examined, it scaled directly with the number of tail segments, with more than double the normal ATPase rate upon tail triplication. As previously observed, disturbance of ATPase activity of the cycling double-ring system, and thus of "dwell time" for the folding protein in the cis cavity, produces effects on folding rates. We conclude that, within the limits of the approximately 10% decrease of cavity volume produced by tail triplication, there does not appear to be an effect of "close confinement" on folding in the cis cavity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17372195      PMCID: PMC1828711          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0700820104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  Basis of substrate binding by the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Z Wang; H p Feng; S J Landry; J Maxwell; L M Gierasch
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  W A Houry; D Frishman; C Eckerskorn; F Lottspeich; F U Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  D Thirumalai; G H Lorimer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2001

4.  Cooperation of GroEL/GroES and DnaK/DnaJ heat shock proteins in preventing protein misfolding in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Gragerov; E Nudler; N Komissarova; G A Gaitanaris; M E Gottesman; V Nikiforov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  ATP induces large quaternary rearrangements in a cage-like chaperonin structure.

Authors:  H R Saibil; D Zheng; A M Roseman; A S Hunter; G M Watson; S Chen; A Auf Der Mauer; B P O'Hara; S P Wood; N H Mann; L K Barnett; R J Ellis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate.

Authors:  J Martin; T Langer; R Boteva; A Schramel; A L Horwich; F U Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES.

Authors:  J S Weissman; C M Hohl; O Kovalenko; Y Kashi; S Chen; K Braig; H R Saibil; W A Fenton; A L Horwich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-11-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex.

Authors:  M Mayhew; A C da Silva; J Martin; H Erdjument-Bromage; P Tempst; F U Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Leu309 plays a critical role in the encapsulation of substrate protein into the internal cavity of GroEL.

Authors:  Ayumi Koike-Takeshita; Tatsuro Shimamura; Ken Yokoyama; Masasuke Yoshida; Hideki Taguchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding.

Authors:  M J Todd; P V Viitanen; G H Lorimer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  24 in total

1.  Indole-3-glycerol-phosphate synthase is recognized by a cold-inducible group II chaperonin in Thermococcus kodakarensis.

Authors:  Le Gao; Atsushi Danno; Sayaka Fujii; Wakao Fukuda; Tadayuki Imanaka; Shinsuke Fujiwara
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Single-molecule spectroscopy of protein folding in a chaperonin cage.

Authors:  Hagen Hofmann; Frank Hillger; Shawn H Pfeil; Armin Hoffmann; Daniel Streich; Dominik Haenni; Daniel Nettels; Everett A Lipman; Benjamin Schuler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Development of free-energy-based models for chaperonin containing TCP-1 mediated folding of actin.

Authors:  Gabriel M Altschuler; Keith R Willison
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Sequential action of ATP-dependent subunit conformational change and interaction between helical protrusions in the closure of the built-in lid of group II chaperonins.

Authors:  Taro Kanzaki; Ryo Iizuka; Kazunobu Takahashi; Kosuke Maki; Rie Masuda; Muhamad Sahlan; Hugo Yébenes; José M Valpuesta; Toshihiko Oka; Masahiro Furutani; Noriyuki Ishii; Kunihiro Kuwajima; Masafumi Yohda
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Triggering protein folding within the GroEL-GroES complex.

Authors:  Damian Madan; Zong Lin; Hays S Rye
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Effect of the C-terminal truncation on the functional cycle of chaperonin GroEL: implication that the C-terminal region facilitates the transition from the folding-arrested to the folding-competent state.

Authors:  Mihoko Suzuki; Taro Ueno; Ryo Iizuka; Takahiro Miura; Tamotsu Zako; Rena Akahori; Takeo Miyake; Naonobu Shimamoto; Mutsuko Aoki; Takashi Tanii; Iwao Ohdomari; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Essential role of the chaperonin folding compartment in vivo.

Authors:  Yun-Chi Tang; Hung-Chun Chang; Kausik Chakraborty; F Ulrich Hartl; Manajit Hayer-Hartl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 8.  Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence.

Authors:  Andrew I Jewett; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Effects of C-terminal Truncation of Chaperonin GroEL on the Yield of In-cage Folding of the Green Fluorescent Protein.

Authors:  So Ishino; Yasushi Kawata; Hideki Taguchi; Naoko Kajimura; Katsumi Matsuzaki; Masaru Hoshino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Requirement for binding multiple ATPs to convert a GroEL ring to the folding-active state.

Authors:  Eli Chapman; George W Farr; Wayne A Fenton; Steven M Johnson; Arthur L Horwich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.