Literature DB >> 16239229

Leu309 plays a critical role in the encapsulation of substrate protein into the internal cavity of GroEL.

Ayumi Koike-Takeshita1, Tatsuro Shimamura, Ken Yokoyama, Masasuke Yoshida, Hideki Taguchi.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the native GroEL.GroES.substrate protein complex from Thermus thermophilus, one GroEL subunit makes contact with two GroES subunits. One contact is through the H-I helices, and the other is through a novel GXXLE region. The side chain of Leu, in the GXXLE region, forms a hydrophobic cluster with residues of the H helix (Shimamura, T., Koike-Takeshita, A., Yokoyama, K., Masui, R., Murai, N., Yoshida, M., Taguchi, H., and Iwata, S. (2004) Structure (Camb.) 12, 1471-1480). Here, we investigated the functional role of Leu in the GXXLE region, using Escherichia coli GroEL. The results are as follows: (i) cross-linking between introduced cysteines confirmed that the GXXLE region in the E. coli GroEL.GroES complex is also in contact with GroES; (ii) when Leu was replaced by Lys (GroEL(L309K)) or other charged residues, chaperone activity was largely lost; (iii) the GroEL(L309K).substrate complex failed to bind GroES to produce a stable GroEL(L309K).GroES.substrate complex, whereas free GroEL(L309K) bound GroES normally; (iv) the GroEL(L309K).GroES.substrate complex was stabilized with BeF(x), but the substrate protein in the complex was readily digested by protease, indicating that it was not properly encapsulated into the internal cavity of the complex. Thus, conformational communication between the two GroES contact sites, the H helix and the GXXLE region (through Leu(309)), appears to play a critical role in encapsulation of the substrate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16239229     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M506298200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  7 in total

1.  A systematic survey of in vivo obligate chaperonin-dependent substrates.

Authors:  Kei Fujiwara; Yasushi Ishihama; Kenji Nakahigashi; Tomoyoshi Soga; Hideki Taguchi
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Revisiting the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle via the symmetric intermediate implied by novel aspects of the GroEL(D398A) mutant.

Authors:  Ayumi Koike-Takeshita; Masasuke Yoshida; Hideki Taguchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Chloroplast β chaperonins from A. thaliana function with endogenous cpn10 homologs in vitro.

Authors:  Anna Vitlin; Celeste Weiss; Keren Demishtein-Zohary; Aviram Rasouly; Doron Levin; Odelia Pisanty-Farchi; Adina Breiman; Abdussalam Azem
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Single-molecule observation of protein folding in symmetric GroEL-(GroES)2 complexes.

Authors:  Yodai Takei; Ryo Iizuka; Taro Ueno; Takashi Funatsu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Perturbed ATPase activity and not "close confinement" of substrate in the cis cavity affects rates of folding by tail-multiplied GroEL.

Authors:  George W Farr; Wayne A Fenton; Arthur L Horwich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Cpn20: siamese twins of the chaperonin world.

Authors:  Celeste Weiss; Anat Bonshtien; Odelia Farchi-Pisanty; Anna Vitlin; Abdussalam Azem
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Asp-52 in combination with Asp-398 plays a critical role in ATP hydrolysis of chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  Ayumi Koike-Takeshita; Kaoru Mitsuoka; Hideki Taguchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 5.157

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.