Literature DB >> 17370139

The accuracy of length measurements using different intravascular ultrasound motorized transducer pullback systems.

Kaoru Tanaka1, Stéphane G Carlier, Gary S Mintz, Koichi Sano, Xuebo Liu, Kenichi Fujii, Jose de Ribamar Costa, Joanna Lui, Jeffrey W Moses, Gregg W Stone, Martin B Leon.   

Abstract

Accurate length measurements by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are necessary for stent length selection and for IVUS volumetric analysis. The comparative accuracy of commercially available transducer pullback systems--a necessity for accurate IVUS length and volume measurements--has never been studied. We evaluated the accuracy of four IVUS pullback systems by studying 180 patients (45 in each group) who had been treated with a single stent of known length. Stented lesions were located in the left anterior descending artery (n = 77), left circumflex artery (n = 41), right coronary artery (n = 41), left main (n = 2), and saphenous vein grafts (n = 19). The known lengths of implanted stents ranged from 8 to 33 mm. The correlations between known stent length and IVUS-measured stent length in each group were 0.92 for CVIS, 0.83 for BSC Galaxy, 0.63 for Endosonics TrackBack, and 0.69 for Volcano Model R-l00 research pullback device, respectively. Furthermore, the absolute value of the difference between the two measurements was 9.1 +/- 13.1%, 8.8 +/- 10.2%, 18.6 +/- 21.5%, and 17.5 +/- 31.4%, respectively. With the Volcano Model R-l00 research pullback device, there were 3 extreme outliers; if these three outliers were excluded, then the correlation improved from 0.69 to 0.91; and the absolute deviation from known stent length improved from 17.5 +/- 31.4% to 9.7 +/- 8.3%. Thus, there is a significant variation in length measurement accuracy among IVUS pullback devices. This should be taken into account both clinically and when planning scientific studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17370139     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-007-9216-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  12 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo comparison of three different intravascular ultrasound catheter designs.

Authors:  S Fort; N A Freeman; P Johnston; E A Cohen; F S Foster
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  ACC/AHA guidelines for percutaneous coronary intervention (revision of the 1993 PTCA guidelines)-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee to revise the 1993 guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  S C Smith; J T Dove; A K Jacobs; J W Kennedy; D Kereiakes; M J Kern; R E Kuntz; J J Popma; H V Schaff; D O Williams; R J Gibbons; J P Alpert; K A Eagle; D P Faxon; V Fuster; T J Gardner; G Gregoratos; R O Russell; S C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-06-19       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Drug-eluting stent thrombosis: results from a pooled analysis including 10 randomized studies.

Authors:  Raúl Moreno; Cristina Fernández; Rosana Hernández; Fernando Alfonso; Dominick J Angiolillo; Manel Sabaté; Javier Escaned; Camino Bañuelos; Antonio Fernández-Ortiz; Carlos Macaya
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  What is the risk of stent thrombosis associated with the use of paclitaxel-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary intervention?: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anthony A Bavry; Dharam J Kumbhani; Thomas J Helton; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Shortening the stent length reduces restenosis with bare metal stents: matched pair comparison of short stenting and conventional stenting.

Authors:  U Dietz; N Holz; C Dauer; H Lambertz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Very long sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for de novo coronary lesions.

Authors:  Muzaffer Degertekin; Chourmouzios A Arampatzis; Pedro A Lemos; Francesco Saia; Angela Hoye; Joost Daemen; Kengo Tanabe; Chi-Hang Lee; Sjoerd J Hofma; Georgios Sianos; Eugene McFadden; Willem van der Giessen; Pieter C Smits; Pim J de Feyter; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Drug-eluting stents: caution and concerns for long-term outcome.

Authors:  Renu Virmani; Andrew Farb; Giulio Guagliumi; Frank D Kolodgie
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.439

8.  Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insights from a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  A L Gaster; U Slothuus Skjoldborg; J Larsen; L Korsholm; C von Birgelen; S Jensen; P Thayssen; K E Pedersen; T H Haghfelt
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Cost-effectiveness of intracoronary ultrasound for percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Christian Mueller; John Mc B Hodgson; Christian Schindler; André P Perruchoud; Helmut Roskamm; Heinz J Buettner
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Effects of stent length and lesion length on coronary restenosis.

Authors:  Laura Mauri; A James O'Malley; Donald E Cutlip; Kalon K L Ho; Jeffrey J Popma; Manish S Chauhan; Donald S Baim; David J Cohen; Richard E Kuntz
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  9 in total

1.  Intravascular ultrasound appearance of scattered necrotic core as an index for deterioration of coronary flow during intervention in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Kenji Sakata; Masa-aki Kawashiri; Hidekazu Ino; Takao Matsubara; Yoshihide Uno; Toshihiko Yasuda; Kenji Miwa; Honin Kanaya; Masakazu Yamagishi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  The role of intravascular ultrasound in the determination of progression and regression of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Hideaki Kaneda; Mitsuyasu Terashima; Hiroshi Yamaguchi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Andres Vasquez; Neville Mistry; Jasvindar Singh
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2014-08

4.  "Does imaging paint a sugar-coated picture of diabetic vessels?" : plaque composition in diabetics by IVUS and CT angiography.

Authors:  Szilard Voros
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Longitudinal stent elongation or shortening after deployment in the coronary arteries: which is dominant?

Authors:  Magdy Algowhary; Mohammed Aboel-Kassem F Abdelmegid
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2021-05-17

6.  Assessment of three dimensional quantitative coronary analysis by using rotational angiography for measurement of vessel length and diameter.

Authors:  Jin Bae Lee; Sung Gug Chang; So Yeon Kim; Young Soo Lee; Jae Kean Ryu; Ji Yong Choi; Kee Sik Kim; Jae Sik Park
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Niels R Holm; Gerhard Koning; Zheng Huang; Johan H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Magdy Algowhary; Salma Taha; Hosam Hasan-Ali; Akihiko Matsumura
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2019-12-19

9.  Comparison of quantitative measurements between two different intravascular ultrasound catheters and consoles: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Okura; Makoto Watanabe; Akihiro Miura; Muneo Kurokawa; Tomoya Ueda; Tsunenari Soeda; Yoshihiko Saito
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2021-02-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.