Literature DB >> 17365540

What is modelled during observational learning?

Nicola J Hodges1, A Mark Williams, Spencer J Hayes, Gavin Breslin.   

Abstract

In this article, we examine the question of what information is processed during observational learning by evaluating a variety of methods, theories, and empirical data. Initially, we review work involving neuroimaging techniques and infant imitation. We then evaluate data from behavioural experiments involving adults, wherein a variety of attempts have been made to isolate the critical or minimal information constraining the acquisition of coordination. This body of research has included comparisons between video and point-light displays, manipulations to the amount and type of information presented in the display, the collection of point-of-gaze data, and manipulations to the task context in terms of outcome goals. We conclude that observational learning is governed by specific features of the model's action (i.e. motions of the end effector) and the task (i.e. outcome constraints) and, in contrast with traditional theoretical modelling, more global aspects of a model (i.e. the relative motions within and between joints) do not appear to be the primary method for constraining action execution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17365540     DOI: 10.1080/02640410600946860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  31 in total

1.  Learning through observation: a combination of expert and novice models favors learning.

Authors:  Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Absence of after-effects for observers after watching a visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Nicola J Hodges; Olav E Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Observation and physical practice: different practice contexts lead to similar outcomes for the acquisition of kinematic information.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Inchon Park
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-11-19

5.  Observational practice of relative but not absolute motion features in a single-limb multi-joint coordination task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Young U Ryu; Kirk Zihlman; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Observation learning of a motor task: who and when?

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Specificity in practice benefits learning in novice models and variability in demonstration benefits observational practice.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Noah J Dean
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-09-02

8.  What we think we learn from watching others: the moderating role of ability on perceptions of learning from observation.

Authors:  Nicola J Hodges; Thomas Coppola
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-21

9.  Mixed observation favors motor learning through better estimation of the model's performance.

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A safety mechanism for observational learning.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Arnaud Boutin; Thomas Michelet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.