Literature DB >> 17361119

Improving on-line information for potential living kidney donors.

E M Moody1, K K Clemens, L Storsley, A Waterman, C R Parikh, A X Garg.   

Abstract

Individuals who consider becoming living kidney donors often search the internet for reliable information before contacting the transplant center. The quality of such information requires due consideration. Using the search engines Google and Yahoo and the WebMD information portal, two reviewers independently abstracted data on the classification, readability, and general quality of websites. The coverage and accuracy of each site's discussion of the risks, benefits, and process of living donation was also assessed against a checklist of recommended information. Eighty-six unique websites on living kidney donation were found. Most were created by transplant programs and transplant organizations. Although the content of most sites was accurate, almost all (98%) were written above the recommended patient reading level (i.e., fifth grade). On average, each site covered 38% of the recommended information on living donation (range 8-76%). Educational topics of potential long-term medical risks, psychological risks, and expected benefits to the donor were often missing. The most visited websites were often not ranked among the best sites to provide information. By better understanding the nature of on-line information, transplant professionals can direct their patients to the best available websites. Local educational efforts, including the effective use of internet resources, will ensure living donation and complete understanding of the risks by potential donors and recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17361119     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  15 in total

1.  Dialysis Facility Transplant Philosophy and Access to Kidney Transplantation in the Southeast.

Authors:  Jennifer Gander; Teri Browne; Laura Plantinga; Stephen O Pastan; Leighann Sauls; Jenna Krisher; Rachel E Patzer
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.754

2.  Mood, body image, fear of kidney failure, life satisfaction, and decisional stability following living kidney donation: Findings from the KDOC study.

Authors:  J R Rodrigue; J D Schold; P Morrissey; J Whiting; J Vella; L K Kayler; D Katz; J Jones; B Kaplan; A Fleishman; M Pavlakis; D A Mandelbrot
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  Long-term medical risks to the living kidney donor.

Authors:  Ngan N Lam; Krista L Lentine; Andrew S Levey; Bertram L Kasiske; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Decision aids to increase living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Jennifer C Gander; Elisa J Gordon; Rachel E Patzer
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2017-02-09

5.  Living kidney donors and their family caregivers: developing an evidence-based educational and social support website.

Authors:  Laura A Taylor; Nasreen Bahreman; Matthew J Hayat; Frank Hoey; Geetha Rajasekaran; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.187

6.  Adapting the content of cancer web sites to the information needs of patients: reliability and readability.

Authors:  Ruben Alba-Ruiz; Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo; Jaime Jiménez Pernett; Jose Francisco Garcia-Gutierrez; José Manuel Cózar-Olmo; Beatriz Valero-Aguilera
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.536

7.  Readability, content analysis, and racial/ethnic diversity of online living kidney donation information.

Authors:  James R Rodrigue; Mario Feranil; Jenna Lang; Aaron Fleishman
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.863

8.  Content and quality of information provided on canadian dementia websites.

Authors:  Whitney A Dillon; Jeanette C Prorok; Dallas P Seitz
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2013-03-04

9.  Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.

Authors:  Jatin Kaicker; Victoria Borg Debono; Wilfred Dang; Norman Buckley; Lehana Thabane
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Quality and readability of English-language Internet information for vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Lilian Felipe; Eldré W Beukes; Baylie A Fox; Vinaya Manchaiah
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.354

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.