| Literature DB >> 28640438 |
James R Rodrigue1,2, Mario Feranil1, Jenna Lang1, Aaron Fleishman1.
Abstract
More than three-fourths of adults in the USA use the Internet to access health-related information. Adults exploring the possibility of living donation should have access to online content that is readable and comprehensive. We simulated a search of online information about living kidney donation and evaluated readability, topics covered, and racial/ethnic diversity of 21 websites meeting inclusion criteria (eg, hosted by a nonprofit or patient advocacy organization, English content, based in USA). Using standard readability metrics, 62% of sites were classified as "Difficult to read" and none achieved the recommended reading level of sixth grade. On average, websites covered 18.5 (62%) of 30 recommended information topics (range: 7 to 28) and only 2.1 (23%) of 9 racial/ethnic diversity items (range: 0 to 6). Overall, the most common nonprofit or patient advocacy organization websites do not meet the readability standards established by the National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association, many lack fundamental information about living kidney donation, and most are not racially/ethnically diverse. We encourage the transplant community to consider playing a more active role in improving the overall quality of online information disseminated to the general public. Further, there is a need to more critically examine the accuracy of online living donation content in future investigations.Entities:
Keywords: kidney donation; living donation; living donors; online; websites
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28640438 PMCID: PMC5581210 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transplant ISSN: 0902-0063 Impact factor: 2.863