BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of dialysis facility treatment philosophy on access to transplant. The aim of our study was to determine the relationship between the dialysis facility transplant philosophy and facility-level access to kidney transplant waitlisting. METHODS: A 25-item questionnaire administered to Southeastern dialysis facilities (n = 509) in 2012 captured the facility transplant philosophy (categorized as 'transplant is our first choice', 'transplant is a great option for some', and 'transplant is a good option, if the patient is interested'). Facility-level waitlisting and facility characteristics were obtained from the 2008-2011 Dialysis Facility Report. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between the dialysis facility transplant philosophy and facility waitlisting performance (dichotomized using the national median), where low performance was defined as fewer than 21.7% of dialysis patients waitlisted within a facility. RESULTS: Fewer than 25% (n = 124) of dialysis facilities reported 'transplant is our first option'. A total of 131 (31.4%) dialysis facilities in the Southeast were high-performing facilities with respect to waitlisting. Adjusted analysis showed that facilities who reported 'transplant is our first option' were twice (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.0-3.9) as likely to have high waitlisting performance compared to facilities who reported that 'transplant is a good option, if the patient is interested'. CONCLUSIONS: Facilities with staff who had a more positive transplant philosophy were more likely to have better facility waitlisting performance. Future prospective studies are needed to further investigate if improving the kidney transplant philosophy in dialysis facilities improves access to transplantation.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of dialysis facility treatment philosophy on access to transplant. The aim of our study was to determine the relationship between the dialysis facility transplant philosophy and facility-level access to kidney transplant waitlisting. METHODS: A 25-item questionnaire administered to Southeastern dialysis facilities (n = 509) in 2012 captured the facility transplant philosophy (categorized as 'transplant is our first choice', 'transplant is a great option for some', and 'transplant is a good option, if the patient is interested'). Facility-level waitlisting and facility characteristics were obtained from the 2008-2011 Dialysis Facility Report. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between the dialysis facility transplant philosophy and facility waitlisting performance (dichotomized using the national median), where low performance was defined as fewer than 21.7% of dialysis patients waitlisted within a facility. RESULTS: Fewer than 25% (n = 124) of dialysis facilities reported 'transplant is our first option'. A total of 131 (31.4%) dialysis facilities in the Southeast were high-performing facilities with respect to waitlisting. Adjusted analysis showed that facilities who reported 'transplant is our first option' were twice (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.0-3.9) as likely to have high waitlisting performance compared to facilities who reported that 'transplant is a good option, if the patient is interested'. CONCLUSIONS: Facilities with staff who had a more positive transplant philosophy were more likely to have better facility waitlisting performance. Future prospective studies are needed to further investigate if improving the kidney transplant philosophy in dialysis facilities improves access to transplantation.
Authors: C Conesa; A Ríos; P Ramírez; J Sánchez; E Sánchez; O M Fernández; M M Rodríguez; F Ramos; P Parrilla Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: C Conesa; A Ríos; P Ramírez; J Sánchez; E Sánchez; M M Rodríguez; L Martínez; F Ramos; P Parrilla Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Megan L Salter; Babak Orandi; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Andrew Law; Lucy A Meoni; Bernard G Jaar; Stephen M Sozio; Wen Hong Linda Kao; Rulan S Parekh; Dorry L Segev Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: David D Aufhauser; Allison W Peng; Douglas R Murken; Seth J Concors; Peter L Abt; Deirdre Sawinski; Roy D Bloom; Peter P Reese; Matthew H Levine Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Rachel E Patzer; Sudeshna Paul; Laura Plantinga; Jennifer Gander; Leighann Sauls; Jenna Krisher; Laura L Mulloy; Eric M Gibney; Teri Browne; Carlos F Zayas; William M McClellan; Kimberly Jacob Arriola; Stephen O Pastan Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Laura C Plantinga; Stephen O Pastan; Adam S Wilk; Jenna Krisher; Laura Mulloy; Eric M Gibney; Rachel E Patzer Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2016-11-20 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Teri Browne; Rachel E Patzer; Jennifer Gander; M Ahinee Amamoo; Jenna Krisher; Leighann Sauls; Stephen Pastan Journal: Clin Transplant Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 2.863
Authors: Rachel E Patzer; Mohua Basu; Kayla D Smith; Laura Plantinga; Sumit Mohan; Cam Escoffery; Joyce J Kim; Taylor Melanson; Stephen O Pastan Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Amy D Waterman; John D Peipert; Huiling Xiao; Christina J Goalby; Satoru Kawakita; Yujie Cui; Krista L Lentine Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 5.385
Authors: Teri Browne; Ahinee Amamoo; Rachel E Patzer; Jenna Krisher; Henry Well; Jennifer Gander; Stephen O Pastan Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2016-07-30 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Kristie J Lipford; Laura McPherson; Reem Hamoda; Teri Browne; Jennifer C Gander; Stephen O Pastan; Rachel E Patzer Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Teri Browne; Laura McPherson; Samantha Retzloff; Amandha Darius; Adam S Wilk; Alexandra Cruz; Shannon Wright; Stephen O Pastan; Jennifer C Gander; Alexander A Berlin; Rachel E Patzer Journal: Kidney Med Date: 2021-07-07