Literature DB >> 19445451

Explicit orientation dependence in empirical potentials and its significance to side-chain modeling.

Jianpeng Ma1.   

Abstract

Protein structure modeling and prediction have important applications throughout the biological sciences, from the design of pharmaceuticals to the elucidation of enzyme mechanisms. At the core of most protein modeling is an energy function, the minimum of which represents the free energy "cost" for forming a correct protein structure. The most commonly used energy functions are knowledge-based statistical potential functions; that is, they are empirically derived from statistical analysis of a set of high-resolution protein structures. When that kind of potential function is constructed, the anisotropic orientation dependence between the interacting groups is a critical component for accurately representing key molecular interactions, such as those involved in protein side-chain packing. In the literature, however, many potential functions are limited in their ability to describe orientation dependence. In all-atom potentials, they typically ignore heterogeneous chemical-bond connectivity. In coarse-grained potentials, such as (semi)-residue-based potentials, the simplified representation of residues often reduces the sensitivity of the potential to side-chain orientation. Recently, in an effort to maximally capture the orientation dependence in side-chain interactions, a new type of all-atom statistical potential was developed: OPUS-PSP (potential derived from side-chain packing). The key feature of this potential is its explicit description of orientation dependence in molecular interactions, which is achieved with a basis set of 19 rigid-body blocks extracted from the chemical structures of 20 amino acid residues. This basis set is specifically designed to maximally capture the essential elements of orientation dependence in molecular packing interactions. The potential is constructed from the orientation-specific packing statistics of pairs of those blocks in a nonredundant structural database. On decoy set tests, OPUS-PSP significantly outperforms most of the existing knowledge-based potentials in terms of both its ability to recognize native structures and its consistency in achieving high Z scores across decoy sets. The application of OPUS-PSP to conformational modeling of side chains has led to another method, called OPUS-Rota. In terms of combined speed and accuracy, OPUS-Rota outperforms all of the other methods in modeling side-chain conformation. In this Account, we briefly outline the basic scheme of the OPUS-PSP potential and its application to side-chain modeling via OPUS-Rota. Future perspectives on the modeling of orientation dependence are also discussed. The computer programs for OPUS-PSP and OPUS-Rota can be downloaded at http://sigler.bioch.bcm.tmc.edu/MaLab . They are free for academic users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19445451      PMCID: PMC2728797          DOI: 10.1021/ar900009e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acc Chem Res        ISSN: 0001-4842            Impact factor:   22.384


  55 in total

1.  Discrimination of native protein structures using atom-atom contact scoring.

Authors:  Brendan J McConkey; Vladimir Sobolev; Marvin Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Comparative protein structure modeling by iterative alignment, model building and model assessment.

Authors:  Bino John; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach.

Authors:  Y Xia; E S Huang; M Levitt; R Samudrala
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06-30       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  OPUS-Ca: a knowledge-based potential function requiring only Calpha positions.

Authors:  Yinghao Wu; Mingyang Lu; Mingzhi Chen; Jialin Li; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Empirical potential function for simplified protein models: combining contact and local sequence-structure descriptors.

Authors:  Jinfeng Zhang; Rong Chen; Jie Liang
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-06-01

6.  Dissecting contact potentials for proteins: relative contributions of individual amino acids.

Authors:  N-V Buchete; J E Straub; D Thirumalai
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-01-01

7.  An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Jerry Tsai; Richard Bonneau; Alexandre V Morozov; Brian Kuhlman; Carol A Rohl; David Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-10-01

8.  Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Matthew S Lin; Nicolas Lux Fawzi; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.006

9.  Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction.

Authors:  R L Dunbrack; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-03-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at the profile level.

Authors:  Qiwen Dong; Xiaolong Wang; Lei Lin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  8 in total

1.  GOAP: a generalized orientation-dependent, all-atom statistical potential for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  OPUS-SSF: A side-chain-inclusive scoring function for ranking protein structural models.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Tianqi Ma; Qinghua Wang; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  OPUS-DOSP: A Distance- and Orientation-Dependent All-Atom Potential Derived from Side-Chain Packing.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Tianqi Ma; Tianwu Zang; Weitao Sun; Qinghua Wang; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  OPTIMIZATION BIAS IN ENERGY-BASED STRUCTURE PREDICTION.

Authors:  Robert J Petrella
Journal:  J Theor Comput Chem       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.939

Review 5.  Energy functions in de novo protein design: current challenges and future prospects.

Authors:  Zhixiu Li; Yuedong Yang; Jian Zhan; Liang Dai; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

6.  A novel side-chain orientation dependent potential derived from random-walk reference state for protein fold selection and structure prediction.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Tunable Coarse Graining for Monte Carlo Simulations of Proteins via Smoothed Energy Tables: Direct and Exchange Simulations.

Authors:  Justin Spiriti; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  OPUS-CSF: A C-atom-based scoring function for ranking protein structural models.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Tianqi Ma; Tianwu Zang; Qinghua Wang; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 6.725

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.