Literature DB >> 18054792

Probing protein fold space with a simplified model.

Peter Minary1, Michael Levitt.   

Abstract

We probe the stability and near-native energy landscape of protein fold space using powerful conformational sampling methods together with simple reduced models and statistical potentials. Fold space is represented by a set of 280 protein domains spanning all topological classes and having a wide range of lengths (33-300 residues) amino acid composition and number of secondary structural elements. The degrees of freedom are taken as the loop torsion angles. This choice preserves the native secondary structure but allows the tertiary structure to change. The proteins are represented by three-point per residue, three-dimensional models with statistical potentials derived from a knowledge-based study of known protein structures. When this space is sampled by a combination of parallel tempering and equi-energy Monte Carlo, we find that the three-point model captures the known stability of protein native structures with stable energy basins that are near-native (all alpha: 4.77 A, all beta: 2.93 A, alpha/beta: 3.09 A, alpha+beta: 4.89 A on average and within 6 A for 71.41%, 92.85%, 94.29% and 64.28% for all-alpha, all-beta, alpha/beta and alpha+beta, classes, respectively). Denatured structures also occur and these have interesting structural properties that shed light on the different landscape characteristics of alpha and beta folds. We find that alpha/beta proteins with alternating alpha and beta segments (such as the beta-barrel) are more stable than proteins in other fold classes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18054792      PMCID: PMC2254652          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.10.087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  43 in total

1.  A novel method for sampling alpha-helical protein backbones.

Authors:  B Fain; M Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-12       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics.

Authors:  Loredana Lo Conte; Steven E Brenner; Tim J P Hubbard; Cyrus Chothia; Alexey G Murzin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Computer simulation of protein folding.

Authors:  M Levitt; A Warshel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1987-01-12       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Database algorithm for generating protein backbone and side-chain co-ordinates from a C alpha trace application to model building and detection of co-ordinate errors.

Authors:  L Holm; C Sander
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-03-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Global mapping of the protein structure space and application in structure-based inference of protein function.

Authors:  Jingtong Hou; Se-Ran Jun; Chao Zhang; Sung-Hou Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  On the origin and highly likely completeness of single-domain protein structures.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Isaac A Hubner; Adrian K Arakaki; Eugene Shakhnovich; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Mapping the protein universe.

Authors:  L Holm; C Sander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Structural patterns in globular proteins.

Authors:  M Levitt; C Chothia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  16 in total

1.  Modeling and design by hierarchical natural moves.

Authors:  Adelene Y L Sim; Michael Levitt; Peter Minary
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reducing the dimensionality of the protein-folding search problem.

Authors:  George D Chellapa; George D Rose
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Multiscale natural moves refine macromolecules using single-particle electron microscopy projection images.

Authors:  Junjie Zhang; Peter Minary; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Conformational optimization with natural degrees of freedom: a novel stochastic chain closure algorithm.

Authors:  Peter Minary; Michael Levitt
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Nonlinearities in protein space limit the utility of informatics in protein biophysics.

Authors:  S Rackovsky
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-10

6.  Evolutionary constraints on structural similarity in orthologs and paralogs.

Authors:  Mark E Peterson; Feng Chen; Jeffery G Saven; David S Roos; Patricia C Babbitt; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Global view of the protein universe.

Authors:  Sergey Nepomnyachiy; Nir Ben-Tal; Rachel Kolodny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics.

Authors:  Tobias Sikosek; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  A coarse-grained potential for fold recognition and molecular dynamics simulations of proteins.

Authors:  Peter Májek; Ron Elber
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-09

10.  Splitting statistical potentials into meaningful scoring functions: testing the prediction of near-native structures from decoy conformations.

Authors:  Patrick Aloy; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.