| Literature DB >> 19478871 |
Timothy Y James1, Anastasia P Litvintseva, Rytas Vilgalys, Jess A T Morgan, John W Taylor, Matthew C Fisher, Lee Berger, Ché Weldon, Louis du Preez, Joyce E Longcore.
Abstract
The fungal disease chytridiomycosis, caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, is enigmatic because it occurs globally in both declining and apparently healthy (non-declining) amphibian populations. This distribution has fueled debate concerning whether, in sites where it has recently been found, the pathogen was introduced or is endemic. In this study, we addressed the molecular population genetics of a global collection of fungal strains from both declining and healthy amphibian populations using DNA sequence variation from 17 nuclear loci and a large fragment from the mitochondrial genome. We found a low rate of DNA polymorphism, with only two sequence alleles detected at each locus, but a high diversity of diploid genotypes. Half of the loci displayed an excess of heterozygous genotypes, consistent with a primarily clonal mode of reproduction. Despite the absence of obvious sex, genotypic diversity was high (44 unique genotypes out of 59 strains). We provide evidence that the observed genotypic variation can be generated by loss of heterozygosity through mitotic recombination. One strain isolated from a bullfrog possessed as much allelic diversity as the entire global sample, suggesting the current epidemic can be traced back to the outbreak of a single clonal lineage. These data are consistent with the current chytridiomycosis epidemic resulting from a novel pathogen undergoing a rapid and recent range expansion. The widespread occurrence of the same lineage in both healthy and declining populations suggests that the outcome of the disease is contingent on environmental factors and host resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19478871 PMCID: PMC2680619 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Pathog ISSN: 1553-7366 Impact factor: 6.823
Origin of strains of B. dendrobatidis used in this study.
| Strain | Geographic Origin | Host | Health |
| Al99LB = Alstonville-Lcaerulea-99-LB-1 | Alstonville, New South Wales, Australia |
| clinical |
| CW-026 | Namaqualand, South Africa |
| aclinical |
| CW-027 | Namaqualand, South Africa |
| aclinical |
| CW-029 | Namaqualand, South Africa |
| aclinical |
| CW-034 | Namaqualand, South Africa |
| aclinical |
| CW-036 | Port Elizabeth, South Africa |
| infected tadpole |
| EUR042 | Pyrenees, Spain |
| dead |
| EUR043 | Pyrenees, Spain |
| dead |
| EURC2A | Sierra de Guadarrama, Spain |
| dead |
| JAM011 | Mono Pass, California, USA |
| infected tadpole |
| JAM018 | Mono Pass, California, USA |
| infected tadpole |
| JAM033 | Summit Meadow, California, USA |
| infected tadpole |
| JAM050 | Hitchcock Lakes, California, USA |
| infected tadpole |
| JAM083 | Little Indian Valley, California, USA |
| infected tadpole |
| JAM084 | Little Indian Valley, California, USA |
| infected tadpole |
| JAM102 | Woods Lake, California, USA |
| infected tadpole |
| JEL197 | National Zoological Park, DC, USA |
| dead |
| JEL198 | National Zoological Park, DC, USA |
| dead |
| JEL203 | Bronx Zoo, New York, USA |
| dead |
| JEL213 | Mono Co., California, USA |
| aclinical |
| JEL225 | Africa (from captive population in Wisconsin, USA) |
| aclinical |
| JEL226 | Yavapai Co., Arizona, USA |
| dead |
| JEL229 | Montrose Canyon, Arizona, USA |
| dead |
| JEL230 | Montrose Canyon, Arizona, USA |
| dead |
| JEL231 | Mesquite Wash, Arizona, USA |
| dead |
| JEL239 | Ghana (imported) |
| aclinical |
| JEL253 | Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (captive) |
| clinical |
| JEL254 | Orono, Maine, USA |
| roadkill |
| JEL258 | Orono, Maine, USA |
| roadkill |
| JEL262 | Quebec, Canada |
| aclinical |
| JEL270 | Point Reyes, California, USA |
| aclinical |
| JEL271 | Point Reyes, California, USA |
| aclinical |
| JEL273 | Clear Creek Co., Colorado, USA |
| clinical |
| JEL274 | Clear Creek Co., Colorado, USA |
| clinical |
| JEL275 | Clear Creek Co., Colorado, USA |
| aclinical |
| JEL277 | Arizona, USA |
| aclinical |
| JEL282 | Toledo Zoo, Ohio, USA |
| clinical |
| JEL284 | Wisconsin, USA (captive) |
| aclinical |
| JEL289 | Milford, Maine, USA |
| roadkill |
| JEL404 | Crocker Pond, Oxford County, Maine |
| infected tadpole |
| JEL408 | El Cope, Panama |
| clinical |
| JEL409 | Silenciosa, Panama |
| dead or clinical |
| JEL415 | between Loop and Silenciosa, Panama |
| dead or clinical |
| JEL423 | Guabal, Panama |
| dead or clinical |
| JEL424 | Loop trail, Panama |
| dead or clinical |
| JEL425 | El Cope, Panama |
| dead or clinical |
| JEL427 | Puerto Rico |
| aclinical |
| JEL429 | Venezuela |
| aclinical |
| JP005 | Berkeley, California, USA |
| aclinical |
| LJR089 | Laurel Creek, California, USA |
| infected tadpole |
| LJR299 | Point Reyes, California, USA |
| dead or clinical |
| Me00LB = Melbourne-Llesueuri-00-LB-1 | Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (captive) |
| clinical |
| MM06LB = MtMisery-Lrheocola-06-LB-1 | Mt. Misery, Queensland, Australia |
| dead |
| PM-01 | Panama |
| dead |
| PM-05 | Panama |
| dead |
| PM-07 | Panama |
| dead |
| Ro99LB = Rockhampton-Lcaerulea-99-LB-1 | Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia |
| clinical |
| To05LB = Townsville-Lcaerulea-05-LB-1 | James Cook University, Queensland, Australia (captive) |
| clinical |
| Tu98LB = Tully-Ndayi-98-LB-1 | Tully, Queensland, Australia |
| clinical |
Health refers to the status of the host animal at the time of sampling.
Strain isolated from a tadpole. Infected tadpoles do not usually die until metamorphosis.
Figure 1Dendrogram depicting relationships among Bd strains.
The tree was computed using neighbor-joining in PAUP v4.0b10 [79] with “hetequal” coding, and the thickened branches indicate bootstrap values of 50% or greater.
Heterozygosity of B. dendrobatidis at 17 sequenced loci.
| Comparison | Population | Expected Het. ( | Observed Het. ( | Allele richness | # strains | # genotypes |
|
| Global | 0.468 | 0.552 | 1.98 | 59 | 44 |
| Temperate Americas | 0.488 | 0.575 | 2.00 | 25 | 22 | |
| Tropical Americas | 0.348 | 0.532 | 1.80 | 11 | 5 | |
| Australia | 0.419 | 0.504 | 1.82 | 7 | 6 | |
| Africa | 0.360 | 0.529 | 1.80 | 7 | 4 | |
| captive | 0.467 | 0.431 | 1.98 | 6 | 5 | |
| Europe | 0.558 | 0.833 | – | 3 | 2 | |
|
| bullfrog strains | 0.525 | 0.729 | 2.00 | 5 | 5 |
| clawed frog strains | 0.427 | 0.518 | 1.82 | 5 | 4 | |
| other hosts | 0.468 | 0.537 | 1.96 | 49 | 36 | |
|
| morbid/dead hosts | 0.453 | 0.543 | 1.99 | 30 | 20 |
| aclinical/subclinical hosts | 0.461 | 0.548 | 2.00 | 16 | 12 |
Allele richness is the number of alleles per locus calculated using rarefaction with FSTAT v2.9.3.2 [83]. Samples were rarefied to 5 diploid individuals for geographic comparisons, 4 diploid individuals for host comparisons, and 15 diploid individuals for health comparisons.
Observed heterozygosity is related to position of the locus in the genome.
| Locus | Supercontig | Position (bp) |
|
| Test of HWE | Test of HWE (clone corrected) |
| 6873X2 | 1.1 | 314,229 | 0.328 | 0.336 | 0.0149 | 0.1194 |
| 8392X2 | 1.1 | 359,794 | 0.356 | 0.283 | 0.0361 | 0.2317 |
| 8009X2 | 1.1 | 636,628 | 0.390 | 0.220 | 0.1159 | 0.5491 |
| 6677X2 | 1.1 | 726,612 | 0.431 | 0.144 | 0.3014 | 1.0000 |
| b7-10c | 1.1 | 824,826 | 0.424 | 0.160 | 0.2963 | 1.0000 |
| BdC5 | 1.1 | 1,449,098 | 0.441 | 0.115 | 0.4333 | 0.7553 |
| 8329X2 | 1.1 | 1,603,575 | 0.559 | −0.111 | 0.4406 | 0.3801 |
| BdC24 | 1.1 | 2,750,438 | 0.390 | −0.159 | 0.4297 | 0.2392 |
| 9893X2 | 1.1 | 4,310,256 | 0.123 | 0.564 | 0.0003 | 0.0015 |
| APRT13 | 1.5 | 766,452 | 0.978 | −0.957 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| R6046 | 1.5 | 1,217,203 | 0.254 | 0.247 | 0.1070 | 0.0959 |
| 8702X2 | 1.9 | 139,500 | 0.729 | −0.478 | 0.0004 | 0.0002 |
| 6164Y2 | 1.10 | 272,218 | 0.814 | −0.622 | 0.0000 | 0.0003 |
| mb-b13 | 1.10 | 409,375 | 0.847 | −0.695 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
| BdC18.2 | 1.11 | 461,391 | 0.746 | −0.521 | 0.0001 | 0.0067 |
| BdC18.1 | 1.11 | 461,770 | 0.746 | −0.489 | 0.0002 | 0.0177 |
| CTSYN1 | 1.15 | 117,731 | 0.831 | −0.664 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
F is the inbreeding coefficient that ranges from −1 (fixed heterozygosity) to +1 (complete heterozygote deficit). Position refers to the location within a supercontig in Assembly 1 (September 7, 2006) of the first variable position of the locus. Supercontigs are ordered in descending size from 1.1 (2.38 Mbp) to 1.69 (0.56 Mbp). The test of HWE is the probability that data are drawn from a population in Hardy Weinberg equilibrium, calculated using an exact test [84] as implemented in Genepop v. 3.4 [81]. The test of HWE was conducted for both uncorrected and clone-corrected data sets. Significant values of the test are P<0.05.
Figure 2Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) among closely related strains.
Genotypes for each locus are purple for heterozygous genotypes, red for the higher frequency homozygous genotype, blue for the minority homozygous genotype, and white for missing data. Locus names are shown above the genotypes and are ordered into linkage groups of descending supercontig size based on comparison to genome supercontigs (number shown above the locus names) from the assembly of strain JEL423 (http://www.broad.mit.edu/annotation/genome/batrachochytrium_dendrobatidis). For precise genomic locations, see Table 3. (A) Pattern of LOH showing closely related strains from Panama (green highlighting) and Australia (red highlighting) differing in genotype at a single locus (8702X2). (B) Prevalent genotype from Panama differing from Panamanian genotype shown in (A) by LOH of all markers on supercontig 1.1. (C) Genotypes of strains from the Sierra Nevada showing both LOH (compare JAM083 and JAM084) and highly recombined genotypes (JAM033 and LRJ089).