OBJECTIVE: The validity of quality of care measurement has important implications for practicing clinicians, their patients, and all involved with health care delivery. We used empirical data from managed care patients enrolled in west coast physician organizations to test the hypothesis that observed changes in health-related quality of life across a 2.5-year window reflecting process of care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Patient self-report data as well as clinically detailed medical record review regarding 963 patients with chronic disease associated with managed care from three west coast states. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of change in health-related quality of life scores across 30 months as measured by change in SF-12 physical component scores. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Patient self-report and medical record abstraction. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We found a positive relationship between better process scores and higher burden of illness (p<.05). After adjustment for burden of illness, using an instrumental variables approach revealed better process is associated with smaller declines in SF-12 scores across a 30-month observation window (p=.014). The application of the best quartile of process of care to patients currently receiving poor process is associated with a 4.24 increment in delta SF-12-physical component summary scores. CONCLUSIONS: The use of instrumental variables allowed us to demonstrate a significant relationship between better ambulatory process of care and better health-related quality of life. This finding underscores the importance of efforts to improve the process of care.
OBJECTIVE: The validity of quality of care measurement has important implications for practicing clinicians, their patients, and all involved with health care delivery. We used empirical data from managed care patients enrolled in west coast physician organizations to test the hypothesis that observed changes in health-related quality of life across a 2.5-year window reflecting process of care. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING:Patient self-report data as well as clinically detailed medical record review regarding 963 patients with chronic disease associated with managed care from three west coast states. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of change in health-related quality of life scores across 30 months as measured by change in SF-12 physical component scores. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS:Patient self-report and medical record abstraction. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We found a positive relationship between better process scores and higher burden of illness (p<.05). After adjustment for burden of illness, using an instrumental variables approach revealed better process is associated with smaller declines in SF-12 scores across a 30-month observation window (p=.014). The application of the best quartile of process of care to patients currently receiving poor process is associated with a 4.24 increment in delta SF-12-physical component summary scores. CONCLUSIONS: The use of instrumental variables allowed us to demonstrate a significant relationship between better ambulatory process of care and better health-related quality of life. This finding underscores the importance of efforts to improve the process of care.
Authors: Sheila Leatherman; Donald Berwick; Debra Iles; Lawrence S Lewin; Frank Davidoff; Thomas Nolan; Maureen Bisognano Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Katherine L Kahn; Honghu Liu; John L Adams; Wen-Pin Chen; Diana M Tisnado; David M Carlisle; Ron D Hays; Carol M Mangione; Cheryl L Damberg Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Susan J Bennet; Neil B Oldridge; George J Eckert; Jennifer L Embree; Sherry Browning; Nan Hou; Melissa Deer; Michael D Murray Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ron D Hays; William G Lehrman; Lise Rybowski; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Paul D Cleary Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Rhonda D VanDyke; Gary L McPhail; Bin Huang; Matthew C Fenchel; Raouf S Amin; Adam C Carle; Barb A Chini; Michael Seid Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2013-06
Authors: Anne M Walling; Diana Tisnado; Susan L Ettner; Steven M Asch; Sydney M Dy; Philip Pantoja; Martin Lee; Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Hannah Schreibeis-Baum; Jennifer L Malin; Karl A Lorenz Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Judy Y Chen; May L Tao; Diana Tisnado; Jennifer Malin; Clifford Ko; Martha Timmer; John L Adams; Patricia A Ganz; Katherine L Kahn Journal: Med Care Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Xiao Xu; Eugenia Buta; Rebecca Anhang Price; Marc N Elliott; Ron D Hays; Paul D Cleary Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-12-07 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Melissa M Farmer; Lisa V Rubenstein; Cathy D Sherbourne; Alexis Huynh; Karen Chu; Christine A Lam; Jacqueline J Fickel; Martin L Lee; Maureen E Metzger; Lilia Verchinina; Edward P Post; Edmund F Chaney Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jaclyn L F Bosco; Rebecca A Silliman; Soe Soe Thwin; Ann M Geiger; Diana S M Buist; Marianne N Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Reina Haque; Feifei Wei; Timothy L Lash Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 6.437