Literature DB >> 12674405

The business case for quality: case studies and an analysis.

Sheila Leatherman1, Donald Berwick, Debra Iles, Lawrence S Lewin, Frank Davidoff, Thomas Nolan, Maureen Bisognano.   

Abstract

The financial implications of implementing quality improvements are often poorly understood. Simply put, does improving quality yield a return on investment? We examine four cases--management of high-cost pharmaceuticals, diabetes management, smoking cessation, and wellness programs in the workplace--to understand the financial and clinical implications of improving care. We explore costs and benefits, in both the short and the long term, to four stakeholders with different and sometimes conflicting interests: providers, purchasers and employers, individual patients, and society. Finally, we recommend policy changes to better align financial incentives for superior quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12674405     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.2.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  73 in total

Review 1.  Competition in medical services and the quality of care: concepts and history.

Authors:  Mark V Pauly
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2004-06

2.  Half full? Half empty? A new year's assessment of US health policy.

Authors:  Karen Davis; William M Silberg
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-01-27

3.  A communitywide intervention to improve outcomes and reduce disability among injured workers in Washington State.

Authors:  Thomas M Wickizer; Gary M Franklin; Robert D Mootz; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Roy Plaeger-Brockway; Diana Drylie; Judith A Turner; Terri Smith-Weller
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  The Costs of Participating in a Diabetes Quality Improvement Collaborative: Variation Among Five Clinics.

Authors:  Neha A Sathe; Robert S Nocon; Brenna Hughes; Monica E Peek; Marshall H Chin; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2016-01

Review 5.  Condition based payment: improving care of chronic illness.

Authors:  Albert DiPiero; David G Sanders
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-19

6.  Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: when will health care be paperless?

Authors:  Eric W Ford; Nir Menachemi; M Thad Phillips
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Implementing a national strategy for patient safety: lessons from the National Health Service in England.

Authors:  R Q Lewis; M Fletcher
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-04

8.  Pursuing integration of performance measures into electronic medical records: beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist medications.

Authors:  M Weiner; T E Stump; C M Callahan; J N Lewis; C J McDonald
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-04

9.  The break-even point: when medical advances are less important than improving the fidelity with which they are delivered.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf; Robert E Johnson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 10.  Using markets to reform health care.

Authors:  Nigel Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.