Anne M Walling1, Diana Tisnado2, Susan L Ettner3, Steven M Asch4, Sydney M Dy5, Philip Pantoja6, Martin Lee7, Sangeeta C Ahluwalia8, Hannah Schreibeis-Baum7, Jennifer L Malin7, Karl A Lorenz9. 1. Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; RAND Health, Santa Monica, California, USA. Electronic address: awalling@mednet.ucla.edu. 2. Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Health Science, California State University, Fullerton, California, USA. 3. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, USA; Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. 5. The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 6. RAND Population and Labor, Santa Monica. 7. Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA. 8. RAND Health, Santa Monica, California, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. 9. Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA; VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, USA; Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Although recent randomized controlled trials support early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer, the specific processes of care associated with these findings and whether these improvements can be replicated in the broader health care system are uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of palliative care consultation and its association with specific processes of supportive care in a national cohort of Veterans using the Cancer Quality ASSIST (Assessing Symptoms Side Effects and Indicators of Supportive Treatment) measures. METHODS: We abstracted data from 719 patients' medical records diagnosed with advanced lung, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer in 2008 over a period of three years or until death who received care in the Veterans Affairs Health System to evaluate the association of palliative care specialty consultation with the quality of supportive care overall and by domain using a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: All but 54 of 719 patients died within three years and 293 received at least one palliative care consult. Patients evaluated by a palliative care specialist at diagnosis scored seven percentage points higher overall (P < 0.001) and 11 percentage points higher (P < 0.001) within the information and care planning domain compared with those without a consult. CONCLUSION: Early palliative care specialist consultation is associated with better quality of supportive care in three advanced cancers, predominantly driven by improvements in information and care planning. This study supports the effectiveness of early palliative care consultation in three common advanced cancers within the Veterans Affairs Health System and provides a greater understanding of what care processes palliative care teams influence. Published by Elsevier Inc.
CONTEXT: Although recent randomized controlled trials support early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer, the specific processes of care associated with these findings and whether these improvements can be replicated in the broader health care system are uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of palliative care consultation and its association with specific processes of supportive care in a national cohort of Veterans using the Cancer Quality ASSIST (Assessing Symptoms Side Effects and Indicators of Supportive Treatment) measures. METHODS: We abstracted data from 719 patients' medical records diagnosed with advanced lung, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer in 2008 over a period of three years or until death who received care in the Veterans Affairs Health System to evaluate the association of palliative care specialty consultation with the quality of supportive care overall and by domain using a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: All but 54 of 719 patients died within three years and 293 received at least one palliative care consult. Patients evaluated by a palliative care specialist at diagnosis scored seven percentage points higher overall (P < 0.001) and 11 percentage points higher (P < 0.001) within the information and care planning domain compared with those without a consult. CONCLUSION: Early palliative care specialist consultation is associated with better quality of supportive care in three advanced cancers, predominantly driven by improvements in information and care planning. This study supports the effectiveness of early palliative care consultation in three common advanced cancers within the Veterans Affairs Health System and provides a greater understanding of what care processes palliative care teams influence. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Sherry Weitzen; Kate L Lapane; Alicia Y Toledano; Anne L Hume; Vincent Mor Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Joan D Penrod; Partha Deb; Cornelia Dellenbaugh; James F Burgess; Carolyn W Zhu; Cindy L Christiansen; Carol A Luhrs; Therese Cortez; Elayne Livote; Veleka Allen; R Sean Morrison Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Mary Beth Landrum; Nancy L Keating; Elizabeth B Lamont; Samuel R Bozeman; Steven H Krasnow; Lawrence Shulman; Jennifer R Brown; Craig C Earle; Michael Rabin; Barbara J McNeil Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Sonal Admane; Emily R Gallagher; Vicki A Jackson; Thomas J Lynch; Inga T Lennes; Connie M Dahlin; William F Pirl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David Casarett; Amy Pickard; F Amos Bailey; Christine Ritchie; Christian Furman; Ken Rosenfeld; Scott Shreve; Zhen Chen; Judy A Shea Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-01-16 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Vicki A Jackson; Juliet Jacobsen; Joseph A Greer; William F Pirl; Jennifer S Temel; Anthony L Back Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2013-06-20 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Thomas J Smith; Sarah Temin; Erin R Alesi; Amy P Abernethy; Tracy A Balboni; Ethan M Basch; Betty R Ferrell; Matt Loscalzo; Diane E Meier; Judith A Paice; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Mark Somerfield; Ellen Stovall; Jamie H Von Roenn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nadia N Khan; Ashika Maharaj; Sue Evans; Charles Pilgrim; John Zalcberg; Wendy Brown; Paul Cashin; Daniel Croagh; Natasha Michael; Jeremy Shapiro; Kate White; Liane Ioannou Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 2.655