Melissa M Farmer1, Lisa V Rubenstein2,3,4, Cathy D Sherbourne3, Alexis Huynh2, Karen Chu2, Christine A Lam2, Jacqueline J Fickel2, Martin L Lee2,4, Maureen E Metzger5, Lilia Verchinina5, Edward P Post5,6, Edmund F Chaney7. 1. VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street (152), Sepulveda, CA, 91343, USA. Melissa.Farmer@va.gov. 2. VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 16111 Plummer Street (152), Sepulveda, CA, 91343, USA. 3. RAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA. 4. David Geffen School of Medicine and Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 5. VA Ann Arbor, HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 6. University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 7. University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) has invested substantially in evidence-based mental health care. Yet no electronic performance measures for assessing the level at which the population of Veterans with depression receive appropriate care have proven robust enough to support rigorous evaluation of the VA's depression initiatives. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to develop prototype longitudinal electronic population-based measures of depression care quality, validate the measures using expert panel judgment by VA and non-VA experts, and examine detection, follow-up and treatment rates over a decade (2000-2010). We describe our development methodology and the challenges to creating measures that capture the longitudinal course of clinical care from detection to treatment. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Data come from the National Patient Care Database and Pharmacy Benefits Management Database for primary care patients from 1999 to 2011, from nine Veteran Integrated Service Networks. MEASURES: We developed four population-based quality metrics for depression care that incorporate a 6-month look back and 1-year follow-up: detection of a new episode of depression, 84 and 180 day follow-up, and minimum appropriate treatment 1-year post detection. Expert panel techniques were used to evaluate the measure development methodology and results. Key challenges to creating valid longitudinal measures are discussed. KEY RESULTS: Over the decade, the rates for detection of new episodes of depression remained stable at 7-8 %. Follow-up at 84 and 180 days were 37 % and 45 % in 2000 and increased to 56 % and 63 % by 2010. Minimum appropriate treatment remained relatively stable over the decade (82-84 %). CONCLUSIONS: The development of valid longitudinal, population-based quality measures for depression care is a complex process with numerous challenges. If the full spectrum of care from detection to follow-up and treatment is not captured, performance measures could actually mask the clinical areas in need of quality improvement efforts.
BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) has invested substantially in evidence-based mental health care. Yet no electronic performance measures for assessing the level at which the population of Veterans with depression receive appropriate care have proven robust enough to support rigorous evaluation of the VA's depression initiatives. OBJECTIVE: Our objectives were to develop prototype longitudinal electronic population-based measures of depression care quality, validate the measures using expert panel judgment by VA and non-VA experts, and examine detection, follow-up and treatment rates over a decade (2000-2010). We describe our development methodology and the challenges to creating measures that capture the longitudinal course of clinical care from detection to treatment. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Data come from the National Patient Care Database and Pharmacy Benefits Management Database for primary care patients from 1999 to 2011, from nine Veteran Integrated Service Networks. MEASURES: We developed four population-based quality metrics for depression care that incorporate a 6-month look back and 1-year follow-up: detection of a new episode of depression, 84 and 180 day follow-up, and minimum appropriate treatment 1-year post detection. Expert panel techniques were used to evaluate the measure development methodology and results. Key challenges to creating valid longitudinal measures are discussed. KEY RESULTS: Over the decade, the rates for detection of new episodes of depression remained stable at 7-8 %. Follow-up at 84 and 180 days were 37 % and 45 % in 2000 and increased to 56 % and 63 % by 2010. Minimum appropriate treatment remained relatively stable over the decade (82-84 %). CONCLUSIONS: The development of valid longitudinal, population-based quality measures for depression care is a complex process with numerous challenges. If the full spectrum of care from detection to follow-up and treatment is not captured, performance measures could actually mask the clinical areas in need of quality improvement efforts.
Authors: K B Wells; C Sherbourne; M Schoenbaum; N Duan; L Meredith; J Unützer; J Miranda; M F Carney; L V Rubenstein Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-01-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kenneth Wells; Cathy Sherbourne; Michael Schoenbaum; Susan Ettner; Naihua Duan; Jeanne Miranda; Jürgen Unützer; Lisa Rubenstein Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2004-04
Authors: Jeffrey L Smith; Kathryn M Rost; Paul A Nutting; Anne M Libby; Carl E Elliott; Jeffrey M Pyne Journal: J Ment Health Policy Econ Date: 2002-03
Authors: Andrea Charbonneau; Amy K Rosen; Richard R Owen; Avron Spiro; Arlene S Ash; Donald R Miller; Lewis Kazis; Boris Kader; Fran Cunningham; Dan R Berlowitz Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Lucinda B Leung; Karen E Dyer; Elizabeth M Yano; Alexander S Young; Lisa V Rubenstein; Alison B Hamilton Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Lucinda B Leung; Karen Chu; Danielle Rose; Susan Stockdale; Edward P Post; Kenneth B Wells; Lisa V Rubenstein Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-03-01
Authors: Paul N Pfeiffer; Kara Zivin; Avinash Hosanagar; Vanessa Panaite; Dara Ganoczy; H Myra Kim; Timothy Hofer; John D Piette Journal: J Behav Health Serv Res Date: 2022-10-07 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Aaron A Lee; Rebecca K Sripada; Andrew C Hale; Dara Ganoczy; Ranak B Trivedi; Bruce Arnow; Paul N Pfeiffer Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2021-05