J Wang1, T Jiang, Q Cao, Y Wang. 1. National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Most previous neuroimaging studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) rely on the manual delineation of the region of interest, which is subjective and lacks reproducibility. The purpose of this study was to use an automated method to assess whether there are abnormalities in the brains of patients with ADHD. In view of findings from previous imaging and neuropsychologic studies, we predicted that we would detect abnormalities in many brain regions of patients with ADHD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve boys with ADHD and 12 control subjects underwent MR imaging assessments. Statistically significant changes in regional volume were analyzed by using deformation based morphometry (DBM). This technique derived a voxel-wise estimation of regional tissue volume change from the deformation field required to warp subject to the template image. Morphologic differences between groups were estimated at each voxel, applying a threshold (P < .001) to the resulting voxel statistic maps to generate clusters of spatially contiguous suprathreshold voxels, RESULTS: The statistical results reveal some pronounced volume alterations in the brains of ADHD. Volume reductions are mainly localized in right prefrontal (Talairach 48, 20, 31), right medial temporal (Talairach 59, -52, 13), left parietal lobe (Talairach -32, -61, 41), and right basal ganglia (especially right putamen) (Talairach 21, 1, 11); the regions of volume enlargement in the brains of ADHD are observed in the right occipital lobe (Talairach 20, -86, 29) and in the left posterior lateral ventricle (Talairach -23, -40, 15). CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that there are widespread abnormalities in volume of boys with ADHD.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Most previous neuroimaging studies of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) rely on the manual delineation of the region of interest, which is subjective and lacks reproducibility. The purpose of this study was to use an automated method to assess whether there are abnormalities in the brains of patients with ADHD. In view of findings from previous imaging and neuropsychologic studies, we predicted that we would detect abnormalities in many brain regions of patients with ADHD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve boys with ADHD and 12 control subjects underwent MR imaging assessments. Statistically significant changes in regional volume were analyzed by using deformation based morphometry (DBM). This technique derived a voxel-wise estimation of regional tissue volume change from the deformation field required to warp subject to the template image. Morphologic differences between groups were estimated at each voxel, applying a threshold (P < .001) to the resulting voxel statistic maps to generate clusters of spatially contiguous suprathreshold voxels, RESULTS: The statistical results reveal some pronounced volume alterations in the brains of ADHD. Volume reductions are mainly localized in right prefrontal (Talairach 48, 20, 31), right medial temporal (Talairach 59, -52, 13), left parietal lobe (Talairach -32, -61, 41), and right basal ganglia (especially right putamen) (Talairach 21, 1, 11); the regions of volume enlargement in the brains of ADHD are observed in the right occipital lobe (Talairach 20, -86, 29) and in the left posterior lateral ventricle (Talairach -23, -40, 15). CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that there are widespread abnormalities in volume of boys with ADHD.
Authors: P Hellier; C Barillot; I Corouge; B Gibaud; G Le Goualher; D L Collins; A Evans; G Malandain; N Ayache; G E Christensen; H J Johnson Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: R J Seitz; A G Canavan; L Yágüez; H Herzog; L Tellmann; U Knorr; Y Huang; V Hömberg Journal: Eur J Neurosci Date: 1997-02 Impact factor: 3.386
Authors: Philip R Szeszko; Babak A Ardekani; Manzar Ashtari; Sanjiv Kumra; Delbert G Robinson; Serge Sevy; Handan Gunduz-Bruce; Anil K Malhotra; John M Kane; Robert M Bilder; Kelvin O Lim Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: M Ernst; L L Liebenauer; A C King; G A Fitzgerald; R M Cohen; A J Zametkin Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1994 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Sven C Mueller; Deborah P Merke; Ellen W Leschek; Steven Fromm; Carol VanRyzin; Monique Ernst Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: Loren J Sobel; Ravi Bansal; Tiago V Maia; Juan Sanchez; Luigi Mazzone; Kathleen Durkin; Jun Liu; Xuejun Hao; Iliyan Ivanov; Ann Miller; Laurence L Greenhill; Bradley S Peterson Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Eric D Brooks; Jenny Yang; Joel S Beckett; Cheryl Lacadie; Dustin Scheinost; Sarah Persing; Elizabeth G Zellner; Devon Oosting; Cara Keifer; Hannah E Friedman; Brent Vander Wyk; Roger J Jou; Haosi Sun; Cyril Gary; Charles C Duncan; R Todd Constable; Kevin A Pelphrey; John A Persing Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Zhaoying Han; Tricia A Thornton-Wells; Elisabeth M Dykens; John C Gore; Benoit M Dawant Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Melissa Lopez-Larson; Emily S Michael; Janine E Terry; Janis L Breeze; Steven M Hodge; Lena Tang; David N Kennedy; Constance M Moore; Nikos Makris; Verne S Caviness; Jean A Frazier Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: D van 't Ent; C E M van Beijsterveldt; E M Derks; J J Hudziak; D J Veltman; R D Todd; D I Boomsma; E J C De Geus Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 3.590