Literature DB >> 22459439

Effect of nonrigid registration algorithms on deformation-based morphometry: a comparative study with control and Williams syndrome subjects.

Zhaoying Han1, Tricia A Thornton-Wells, Elisabeth M Dykens, John C Gore, Benoit M Dawant.   

Abstract

Deformation-based morphometry (DBM) is a widely used method for characterizing anatomical differences across groups. DBM is based on the analysis of the deformation fields generated by nonrigid registration algorithms, which warp the individual volumes to a DBM atlas. Although several studies have compared nonrigid registration algorithms for segmentation tasks, few studies have compared the effect of the registration algorithms on group differences that may be uncovered through DBM. In this study, we compared group atlas creation and DBM results obtained with five well-established nonrigid registration algorithms using 13 subjects with Williams syndrome and 13 normal control subjects. The five nonrigid registration algorithms include the following: (1) the adaptive bases algorithm, (2) the image registration toolkit, (3) The FSL nonlinear image registration tool, (4) the automatic registration tool, and (5) the normalization algorithm available in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8). Results indicate that the choice of algorithm has little effect on the creation of group atlases. However, regions of differences between groups detected with DBM vary from algorithm to algorithm both qualitatively and quantitatively. Some regions are detected by several algorithms, but their extent varies. Others are detected only by a subset of the algorithms. Based on these results, we recommend using more than one algorithm when performing DBM studies.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22459439      PMCID: PMC4410977          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  37 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  An MRI study of structural variations in schizophrenia using deformation field morphometry.

Authors:  Uicheul Yoon; Jong-Min Lee; Jun Soo Kwon; Hyun-Pil Kim; Yong-Wook Shin; Tae Hyon Ha; In Young Kim; Kee-Hyun Chang; Sun I Kim
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.222

4.  Anomalous sylvian fissure morphology in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Albert M Galaburda; Asya Karchemskiy; Alyssa Liang; Paul Thompson; Rebecca A Dutton; Agatha D Lee; Ursula Bellugi; Julie R Korenberg; Debra Mills; Fredric E Rose; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  To modulate or not to modulate: differing results in uniquely shaped Williams syndrome brains.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Adam Tenforde; Albert M Galaburda; Ursula Bellugi; Julie R Korenberg; Debra Mills; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  IV. Neuroanatomy of Williams syndrome: a high-resolution MRI study.

Authors:  A L Reiss; S Eliez; J E Schmitt; E Straus; Z Lai; W Jones; U Bellugi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Symmetry of cortical folding abnormalities in Williams syndrome revealed by surface-based analyses.

Authors:  David C Van Essen; Donna Dierker; A Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle; Allan L Reiss; Julie Korenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Detecting structural changes in whole brain based on nonlinear deformations-application to schizophrenia research.

Authors:  C Gaser; H P Volz; S Kiebel; S Riehemann; H Sauer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Neural basis of genetically determined visuospatial construction deficit in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Philip Kohn; Carolyn B Mervis; J Shane Kippenhan; Rosanna K Olsen; Colleen A Morris; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Spatial Registration Toolbox for Structural MR Imaging of the Aging Brain.

Authors:  Marco Ganzetti; Quanying Liu; Dante Mantini
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-04

2.  Relation between brain architecture and mathematical ability in children: a DBM study.

Authors:  Zhaoying Han; Nicole Davis; Lynn Fuchs; Adam W Anderson; John C Gore; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Physical Constraint Finite Element Model for Medical Image Registration.

Authors:  Jingya Zhang; Jiajun Wang; Xiuying Wang; Xin Gao; Dagan Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.