Literature DB >> 8175083

DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands.

D J Balding1, R A Nichols.   

Abstract

In DNA profile analysis, uncertainty arises due to a number of factors such as sampling error, single bands and correlations within and between loci. One of the most important of these factors is kinship: criminal and innocent suspect may share one or more bands through identity by descent from a common ancestor. Ignoring this uncertainty is consistently unfair to innocent suspects. The effect is usually small, but may be important in some cases. The report of the US National Research Committee proposed a complicated, ad-hoc and overly-conservative method of dealing with some of these problems. We propose an alternative approach which addresses directly the effect of kinship. Whilst remaining conservative, it is simple, logically coherent and makes efficient use of the data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8175083     DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(94)90222-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  76 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Identification of the minor component of a mixed stain by using mismatch primer-induced restriction sites in amplified mtDNA.

Authors:  R Szibor; M Michael; I Plate; H Wittig; D Krause
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  The statistical evaluation of DNA mixtures with contributors from different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Wing K Fung; Yue-Qing Hu
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Significance of micro-geographical population structure in forensic cases: a bayesian exploration.

Authors:  María T Zarrabeitia; José A Riancho; María V Lareu; Francisco Leyva-Cobián; Angel Carracedo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Inferring coancestry in population samples in the presence of linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  M D Brown; C G Glazner; C Zheng; E A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Pedigree likelihood ratio for lineage markers.

Authors:  Jianye Ge; Arthur Eisenberg; Jiangwei Yan; Ranajit Chakraborty; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Likelihood-free inference of population structure and local adaptation in a Bayesian hierarchical model.

Authors:  Eric Bazin; Kevin J Dawson; Mark A Beaumont
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Forensic identification of urine samples: a comparison between nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers.

Authors:  V Castella; N Dimo-Simonin; C Brandt-Casadevall; N Robinson; M Saugy; F Taroni; P Mangin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  It was one of my brothers.

Authors:  Amy D Anderson; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  Genotypic probabilities for pairs of inbred relatives.

Authors:  Wenlei Liu; B S Weir
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.