Literature DB >> 16251456

Measures of human population structure show heterogeneity among genomic regions.

Bruce S Weir1, Lon R Cardon, Amy D Anderson, Dahlia M Nielsen, William G Hill.   

Abstract

Estimates of genetic population structure (F(ST)) were constructed from all autosomes in two large SNP data sets. The Perlegen data set contains genotypes on approximately 1 million SNPs segregating in all three samples of Americans of African, Asian, and European descent; and the Phase I HapMap data set contains genotypes on approximately 0.6 million SNPs segregating in all four samples from specific Caucasian, Chinese, Japanese, and Yoruba populations. Substantial heterogeneity of F(ST) values was found between segments within chromosomes, although there was similarity between the two data sets. There was also substantial heterogeneity among population-specific F(ST) values, with the relative sizes of these values often changing along each chromosome. Population-structure estimates are often used as indicators of natural selection, but the analyses presented here show that individual-marker estimates are too variable to be useful. There is inherent variation in these statistics because of variation in genealogy even among neutral loci, and values at pairs of loci are correlated to an extent that reflects the linkage disequilibrium between them. Furthermore, it may be that the best indications of selection will come from population-specific F(ST) values rather than the usually reported population-average values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16251456      PMCID: PMC1310634          DOI: 10.1101/gr.4398405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  14 in total

Review 1.  Estimating F-statistics.

Authors:  B S Weir; W G Hill
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Genetic signatures of strong recent positive selection at the lactase gene.

Authors:  Todd Bersaglieri; Pardis C Sabeti; Nick Patterson; Trisha Vanderploeg; Steve F Schaffner; Jared A Drake; Matthew Rhodes; David E Reich; Joel N Hirschhorn
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  The genetical structure of populations.

Authors:  S WRIGHT
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1951-03

4.  Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations.

Authors:  David A Hinds; Laura L Stuve; Geoffrey B Nilsen; Eran Halperin; Eleazar Eskin; Dennis G Ballinger; Kelly A Frazer; David R Cox
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The Effect of Inbreeding on the Variation Due to Recessive Genes.

Authors:  A Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1952-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Behavior of pairs of loci in finite monoecious populations.

Authors:  B S Weir; C C Cockerham
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 8.  The effects of inbreeding on forensic calculations.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  Variance of actual inbreeding.

Authors:  C C Cockerham; B S Weir
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.570

10.  Population history and natural selection shape patterns of genetic variation in 132 genes.

Authors:  Joshua M Akey; Michael A Eberle; Mark J Rieder; Christopher S Carlson; Mark D Shriver; Deborah A Nickerson; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  137 in total

1.  Genome-wide detection of natural selection in African Americans pre- and post-admixture.

Authors:  Wenfei Jin; Shuhua Xu; Haifeng Wang; Yongguo Yu; Yiping Shen; Bailin Wu; Li Jin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Population structure with localized haplotype clusters.

Authors:  Sharon R Browning; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Likelihood-free inference of population structure and local adaptation in a Bayesian hierarchical model.

Authors:  Eric Bazin; Kevin J Dawson; Mark A Beaumont
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Unbiased relatedness estimation in structured populations.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A hierarchical Bayesian model for next-generation population genomics.

Authors:  Zachariah Gompert; C Alex Buerkle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Integrating evolutionary and functional approaches to infer adaptation at specific loci.

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Christopher W Wheat
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Schizophrenia and vitamin D related genes could have been subject to latitude-driven adaptation.

Authors:  Roberto Amato; Michele Pinelli; Antonella Monticelli; Gennaro Miele; Sergio Cocozza
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Genome-Wide Scan for Adaptive Divergence and Association with Population-Specific Covariates.

Authors:  Mathieu Gautier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Testing for Ancient Selection Using Cross-population Allele Frequency Differentiation.

Authors:  Fernando Racimo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Association of 8q23-24 region (8q23.3 loci and 8q24.21 loci) with susceptibility to colorectal cancer: a systematic and updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Linlin Li; Li Lv; Yuan Liang; Xiaoyu Shen; Shishi Zhou; Jia Zhu; Rui Ma
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.