Literature DB >> 19224194

Marker-based estimation of the coefficient of coancestry in hybrid breeding programmes.

S Maenhout1, B De Baets, G Haesaert.   

Abstract

Molecular markers allow to estimate the pairwise relatedness between the members of a breeding pool when their selection history is no longer available or has become too complex for a classical pedigree analysis. The field of population genetics has several estimation procedures at its disposal, but when the genotyped individuals are highly selected inbred lines, their application is not warranted as the theoretical assumptions on which these estimators were built, usually linkage equilibrium between marker loci or even Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, are not met. An alternative approach requires the availability of a genotyped reference set of inbred lines, which allows to correct the observed marker similarities for their inherent upward bias when used as a coancestry measure. However, this approach does not guarantee that the resulting coancestry matrix is at least positive semi-definite (psd), a necessary condition for its use as a covariance matrix. In this paper we present the weighted alikeness in state (WAIS) estimator. This marker-based coancestry estimator is compared to several other commonly applied relatedness estimators under realistic hybrid breeding conditions in a number of simulations. We also fit a linear mixed model to phenotypical data from a commercial maize breeding programme and compare the likelihood of the different variance structures. WAIS is shown to be psd which makes it suitable for modelling the covariance between genetic components in linear mixed models involved in breeding value estimation or association studies. Results indicate that it generally produces a low root mean squared error under different breeding circumstances and provides a fit to the data that is comparable to that of several other marker-based alternatives. Recommendations for each of the examined coancestry measures are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224194     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-009-0972-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  23 in total

1.  A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators.

Authors:  T Van de Casteele; P Galbusera; E Matthysen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The estimation of pairwise relationships.

Authors:  E A Thompson
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 1.670

4.  The genetical structure of populations.

Authors:  S WRIGHT
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1951-03

5.  Technical note: Use of marker-based relationships with multiple-trait derivative-free restricted maximal likelihood.

Authors:  Z Zhang; R J Todhunter; E S Buckler; L D Van Vleck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  A maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations.

Authors:  Amy D Anderson; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS.

Authors:  David C Queller; Keith F Goodnight
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness.

Authors:  C C Li; D E Weeks; A Chakravarti
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.444

10.  Precision of methods for calculating identity-by-descent matrices using multiple markers.

Authors:  Anders Christian Sørensen; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Jack J Windig; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  6 in total

1.  Graph-based data selection for the construction of genomic prediction models.

Authors:  Steven Maenhout; Bernard De Baets; Geert Haesaert
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Prediction of maize single-cross hybrid performance: support vector machine regression versus best linear prediction.

Authors:  Steven Maenhout; Bernard De Baets; Geert Haesaert
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Combined linkage and association mapping of flowering time in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.).

Authors:  Elena Cadic; Marie Coque; Felicity Vear; Bruno Grezes-Besset; Jerôme Pauquet; Joël Piquemal; Yannick Lippi; Philippe Blanchard; Michel Romestant; Nicolas Pouilly; David Rengel; Jerôme Gouzy; Nicolas Langlade; Brigitte Mangin; Patrick Vincourt
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Effect of population structure corrections on the results of association mapping tests in complex maize diversity panels.

Authors:  Sofiane Mezmouk; Pierre Dubreuil; Mickaël Bosio; Laurent Décousset; Alain Charcosset; Sébastien Praud; Brigitte Mangin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Comparison of GWAS models to identify non-additive genetic control of flowering time in sunflower hybrids.

Authors:  Fanny Bonnafous; Ghislain Fievet; Nicolas Blanchet; Marie-Claude Boniface; Sébastien Carrère; Jérôme Gouzy; Ludovic Legrand; Gwenola Marage; Emmanuelle Bret-Mestries; Stéphane Munos; Nicolas Pouilly; Patrick Vincourt; Nicolas Langlade; Brigitte Mangin
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and power of a large grapevine (Vitis vinifera L) diversity panel newly designed for association studies.

Authors:  Stéphane D Nicolas; Jean-Pierre Péros; Thierry Lacombe; Amandine Launay; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Aurélie Bérard; Brigitte Mangin; Sophie Valière; Frédéric Martins; Loïc Le Cunff; Valérie Laucou; Roberto Bacilieri; Alexis Dereeper; Philippe Chatelet; Patrice This; Agnès Doligez
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.215

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.