Literature DB >> 16256825

Attention shift not memory averaging reduces foveal bias.

Muhammad Kamal Uddin1, Takahiro Kawabe, Sachio Nakamizo.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined which of two mechanisms, attention shift or memory averaging, reduces foveal bias. The target stimulus was a black dot presented for 80 ms while observers maintained fixation. The two main conditions were 'with' and 'without' vertical and horizontal bars as landmarks, which were placed on more eccentric positions than the target stimulus. To induce attention, the landmark was flashed on for 80 ms (Experiment 1) or disappeared (Experiment 2) with a stimulus onset asynchrony of 0, 106.4, or 212.8 ms in both experiments. As a control, non-flashed and non-disappeared landmark conditions were employed. The observers' task was to point to the remembered location of the target with a mouse cursor. The results showed that the magnitudes of foveal bias were significantly lower in the flashed and disappeared landmark conditions than in the without landmark condition. Furthermore, the magnitudes in the flashed and disappeared landmark conditions did not differ from their respective control conditions. The latter finding in the disappeared landmark conditions provides evidence for 'attention shift' against 'memory averaging' as the mechanism reducing foveal bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16256825     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Mislocalization of a target toward subjective contours: attentional modulation of location signals.

Authors:  Yuki Yamada; Takahiro Kawabe; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-02-28

2.  Gaze direction and the extraction of egocentric distance.

Authors:  Daniel A Gajewski; Courtney P Wallin; John W Philbeck
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  When here becomes there: attentional distribution modulates foveal bias in peripheral localization.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Exploring the edges of visual space: the influence of visual boundaries on peripheral localization.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Shradha Sanghvi; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Distance estimation is influenced by encoding conditions.

Authors:  Anna Oleksiak; Mirosława Mańko; Albert Postma; Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert V van den Berg; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.