Literature DB >> 11164448

Compression of space in visual memory.

B R Sheth1, S Shimojo.   

Abstract

Human observers had to point to the location of a briefly presented target by means of a mouse after a brief delay following target offset. It was found that observers systematically mislocalized the target closer to the center of gaze, and to visually salient markers in the visual display. A perceptual judgment task revealed that these errors in localization were independent of whether or not eye movements were made, and even of planning for them, thereby demonstrating that the effect was a perceptual phenomenon, not a sensorimotor one. Further experiments demonstrated clearly that the magnitude of the time interval between target presentation and judgment regarding its spatial location was the critical parameter. A longer time interval between the event and its report enhanced significantly the amplitude of compression, thus establishing this phenomenon as a visual memory effect. We conclude that visual memory of spatial location is distorted over time in a systematic, monotonic fashion as a result of the sustained fixation of the observer on a fixed location during and shortly after target presentation, or by the continual presence of stable, salient landmarks in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11164448     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00230-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  40 in total

1.  The time course of spatial memory distortions.

Authors:  Steffen Werner; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

2.  Retinotopic memory is more precise than spatiotopic memory.

Authors:  Julie D Golomb; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  When anticipation beats accuracy: Threat alters memory for dynamic scenes.

Authors:  Michael Greenstein; Nancy Franklin; Mariana Martins; Christine Sewack; Markus A Meier
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

4.  Attentional load modulates mislocalization of moving stimuli, but does not eliminate the error.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

5.  Motion-induced illusory displacement reexamined: differences between perception and action?

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Representational momentum in spatial hearing does not depend on eye movements.

Authors:  Stephan Getzmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Transsaccadic integration of visual features in a line intersection task.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Matthias Niemeier; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Mislocalization of perceived saccade target position induced by perisaccadic visual stimulation.

Authors:  Holger Awater; Markus Lappe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Why eye movements and perceptual factors have to be controlled in studies on "representational momentum".

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

10.  Mislocalization of a target toward subjective contours: attentional modulation of location signals.

Authors:  Yuki Yamada; Takahiro Kawabe; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.